asn.dev

Observed topology

AS32042 -Reserved AS-

Upstreams 20 carry this network
Downstreams 0 this network carries
Adjacent (IPv4) 12
Adjacent (IPv6) 15

Transit

Upstream networks

inferred

Networks observed carrying traffic for AS32042: the AS immediately before it in a routing path. Ranked by how many paths showed the relationship, which reflects how widely it is used, not how much traffic crosses it.

ASNetworkTypeFamiliesPaths seen
AS52025ParadoxNetworks LimitedUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv6133
AS6939Hurricane Electric LLCTransitIPv4 IPv681
AS21700Neptune Networks, LLCUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv644
AS835GoCodeIT IncUnclassifiedIPv437
AS3026577997 Newfoundland and Labrador Inc.ResidentialIPv634
AS29632Netassist International EOODUnclassifiedIPv64
AS204092Association GRIFONUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv63
AS3333Reseaux IP Europeens Network Coordination Centre (RIPE NCC)UnclassifiedIPv4 IPv63
AS24482SG.GSHostingIPv4 IPv63
AS48185team.blue NVUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv63
AS205794JINZE YANGUnclassifiedIPv62
AS50673Serverius Holding B.V.UnclassifiedIPv62
AS37721Virtual Technologies & SolutionsResidentialIPv41
AS37100SEACOM LimitedUnclassifiedIPv41
AS6696VERIXI SAUnclassifiedIPv41
AS20485Joint Stock Company TransTeleComUnclassifiedIPv41
AS50629LWLcom GmbHUnclassifiedIPv61
AS17639Converge ICT Solutions Inc.UnclassifiedIPv61
AS42708Glesys ABUnclassifiedIPv61
AS33891Core-Backbone GmbHHostingIPv61

Inferred from path position, not from any declaration by either party. A network appearing here is carrying these routes; whether that is a paid transit arrangement, a backup, or something else is not something routing data can tell you.

Transit

Downstream networks

inferred

Networks for which AS32042 was observed as the last hop before the origin, meaning it appears to provide them transit.

No downstream observed. This network does not appear to carry transit for anyone.

Adjacency

Adjacent networks

27 shown

Every AS seen directly next to AS32042 in a routing path, in either direction.

ASNetworkTypeFamiliesPaths seen
AS52025ParadoxNetworks LimitedUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv6133
AS6939Hurricane Electric LLCTransitIPv4 IPv681
AS21700Neptune Networks, LLCUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv644
AS835GoCodeIT IncUnclassifiedIPv437
AS3026577997 Newfoundland and Labrador Inc.ResidentialIPv634
AS29632Netassist International EOODUnclassifiedIPv64
AS204092Association GRIFONUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv63
AS3333Reseaux IP Europeens Network Coordination Centre (RIPE NCC)UnclassifiedIPv4 IPv63
AS24482SG.GSHostingIPv4 IPv63
AS48185team.blue NVUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv63
AS205794JINZE YANGUnclassifiedIPv62
AS50673Serverius Holding B.V.UnclassifiedIPv62
AS17639Converge ICT Solutions Inc.UnclassifiedIPv61
AS50629LWLcom GmbHUnclassifiedIPv61
AS6696VERIXI SAUnclassifiedIPv41
AS20485Joint Stock Company TransTeleComUnclassifiedIPv41
AS33891Core-Backbone GmbHHostingIPv61
AS37721Virtual Technologies & SolutionsResidentialIPv41
AS37100SEACOM LimitedUnclassifiedIPv41
AS42708Glesys ABUnclassifiedIPv61

Adjacency is not the same as peering. Being next to each other in a path covers paid transit, settlement-free peering and customer connections alike, and routing data cannot distinguish them. Treat this as "these networks exchange routes", nothing more specific.

Interconnection

Exchange presence

recorded

Internet exchanges where Packet Clearing House has a port recorded for AS32042, largest fabric first. An exchange is shared switching where networks interconnect directly rather than paying a transit provider to carry traffic between them, so turning up at one is a deliberate choice about how this network wants to be reached. Each name opens that exchange's own page, with its peering LANs and every other network recorded on it. Recorded at 2 exchanges across 2 countries and 2 regions.

ExchangeLocationTheir addressMember ports
Neutral Internet ExchangeAmsterdam, Netherlands193.239.118.78665
Ontario Internet ExchangeToronto, Canada149.112.50.108198

Unlike the tables above, this is recorded rather than inferred. An address on a peering LAN is at that exchange by definition. Two carve-outs all the same. Member ports counts every participant at the exchange, not this network's ports, so read it as a size proxy. And an absent exchange means PCH has no record of it, not that the network is not there.

Provenance

Where this comes from

Derived from routing tables collected at 2026-08-08 10:00 UTC by route-views2,rrc00, as seen from 75 BGP vantage points across 74.02M route entries. These are observations from those vantage points, not a complete or authoritative view of the internet.

Cross-check against RIPEstat or BGP.tools, which observe from a different and larger set of vantage points.

Exchange presence comes from a separate dataset: the directory collected 2026-08-09 by Packet Clearing House (https://www.pch.net/ixp/data), covering 1,327 exchanges and 93,164 recorded member ports, licensed CC BY-NC-SA 3.0.

PeeringDB is the better-known directory and is deliberately not the source here: its acceptable-use policy forbids the bulk storage this needs. The two answer different questions anyway. PeeringDB reports what an operator declares about itself; this reports what PCH has recorded.