asn.dev

Observed topology

AS29182 RU-JSCIOT

Upstreams 15 carry this network
Downstreams 2 this network carries
Adjacent (IPv4) 16
Adjacent (IPv6) 8

Transit

Upstream networks

inferred

Networks observed carrying traffic for AS29182: the AS immediately before it in a routing path. Ranked by how many paths showed the relationship, which reflects how widely it is used, not how much traffic crosses it.

ASNetworkTypeFamiliesPaths seen
AS9002RETN LimitedUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv62,501
AS1299Arelion Sweden ABTransitIPv4 IPv62,252
AS20764CJSC RASCOMUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv61,530
AS6939Hurricane Electric LLCTransitIPv41,320
AS12389PJSC RostelecomResidentialIPv41,312
AS35598INETCOM CARRIER LLCUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv6728
AS59692IQWeb FZ-LLCUnclassifiedIPv4464
AS50673Serverius Holding B.V.UnclassifiedIPv4330
AS208972GIBIRNET ILETISIM HIZMETLERI SANAYI VE TICARET LIMITED SIRKETIUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv6185
AS24482SG.GSHostingIPv4 IPv6185
AS56655Gigahost ASUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv6178
AS37721Virtual Technologies & SolutionsResidentialIPv4165
AS49673Truenetwork LLCUnclassifiedIPv4165
AS57724DDOS-GUARD LTDUnclassifiedIPv424
AS33891Core-Backbone GmbHHostingIPv62

Inferred from path position, not from any declaration by either party. A network appearing here is carrying these routes; whether that is a paid transit arrangement, a backup, or something else is not something routing data can tell you.

Transit

Downstream networks

inferred

Networks for which AS29182 was observed as the last hop before the origin, meaning it appears to provide them transit.

ASNetworkTypeFamiliesPaths seen
AS211270Golitsyn Valeriy ValerevichUnclassifiedIPv4310
AS213194Nechaev Dmitry SergeevichUnclassifiedIPv462

Adjacency

Adjacent networks

24 shown

Every AS seen directly next to AS29182 in a routing path, in either direction.

ASNetworkTypeFamiliesPaths seen
AS9002RETN LimitedUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv62,582
AS1299Arelion Sweden ABTransitIPv4 IPv62,336
AS20764CJSC RASCOMUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv61,598
AS6939Hurricane Electric LLCTransitIPv41,367
AS12389PJSC RostelecomResidentialIPv41,356
AS35598INETCOM CARRIER LLCUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv6734
AS59692IQWeb FZ-LLCUnclassifiedIPv4464
AS50673Serverius Holding B.V.UnclassifiedIPv4342
AS211270Golitsyn Valeriy ValerevichUnclassifiedIPv4310
AS24482SG.GSHostingIPv4 IPv6191
AS208972GIBIRNET ILETISIM HIZMETLERI SANAYI VE TICARET LIMITED SIRKETIUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv6191
AS56655Gigahost ASUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv6184
AS37721Virtual Technologies & SolutionsResidentialIPv4171
AS49673Truenetwork LLCUnclassifiedIPv4171
AS213194Nechaev Dmitry SergeevichUnclassifiedIPv462
AS57724DDOS-GUARD LTDUnclassifiedIPv424
AS33891Core-Backbone GmbHHostingIPv62

Adjacency is not the same as peering. Being next to each other in a path covers paid transit, settlement-free peering and customer connections alike, and routing data cannot distinguish them. Treat this as "these networks exchange routes", nothing more specific.

Interconnection

Exchange presence

recorded

Internet exchanges where Packet Clearing House has a port recorded for AS29182, largest fabric first. An exchange is shared switching where networks interconnect directly rather than paying a transit provider to carry traffic between them, so turning up at one is a deliberate choice about how this network wants to be reached. Each name opens that exchange's own page, with its peering LANs and every other network recorded on it. Recorded at 2 exchanges across 2 countries and 1 region.

ExchangeLocationTheir addressMember ports
MSK-IX MoscowMoscow, Russia195.208.209.53498
GNM Internet Exchange AmsterdamAmsterdam, Netherlands178.18.224.12420

Unlike the tables above, this is recorded rather than inferred. An address on a peering LAN is at that exchange by definition. Two carve-outs all the same. Member ports counts every participant at the exchange, not this network's ports, so read it as a size proxy. And an absent exchange means PCH has no record of it, not that the network is not there.

Provenance

Where this comes from

Derived from routing tables collected at 2026-08-08 10:00 UTC by route-views2,rrc00, as seen from 75 BGP vantage points across 74.02M route entries. These are observations from those vantage points, not a complete or authoritative view of the internet.

Cross-check against RIPEstat or BGP.tools, which observe from a different and larger set of vantage points.

Exchange presence comes from a separate dataset: the directory collected 2026-08-09 by Packet Clearing House (https://www.pch.net/ixp/data), covering 1,327 exchanges and 93,164 recorded member ports, licensed CC BY-NC-SA 3.0.

PeeringDB is the better-known directory and is deliberately not the source here: its acceptable-use policy forbids the bulk storage this needs. The two answer different questions anyway. PeeringDB reports what an operator declares about itself; this reports what PCH has recorded.