Observed topology
AS28594 All Net Informatica Ltda
Unclassified LACNIC
Transit
Upstream networks
Networks observed carrying traffic for AS28594: the AS immediately before it in a routing path. Ranked by how many paths showed the relationship, which reflects how widely it is used, not how much traffic crosses it.
| AS | Network | Type | Families | Paths seen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS3356 | Level 3 Parent, LLC | Transit | IPv4 IPv6 | 1,130 |
| AS16735 | ALGAR TELECOM S/A | Unclassified | IPv4 IPv6 | 515 |
| AS15830 | Equinix (EMEA) Acquisition Enterprises B.V. | Hosting | IPv4 IPv6 | 251 |
| AS273490 | FIBRION INTERNET LTDA | Unclassified | IPv4 | 35 |
| AS264223 | MULTIPLIC COMUNICACAO E TECNOLOGIA LTDA -ME | Residential | IPv4 | 25 |
Transit
Downstream networks
Networks for which AS28594 was observed as the last hop before the origin, meaning it appears to provide them transit.
| AS | Network | Type | Families | Paths seen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS52875 | M.I.MONTREAL INFORMATICA LTDA | Unclassified | IPv4 | 86 |
Adjacency
Adjacent networks
Every AS seen directly next to AS28594 in a routing path, in either direction.
| AS | Network | Type | Families | Paths seen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS3356 | Level 3 Parent, LLC | Transit | IPv4 IPv6 | 1,216 |
| AS16735 | ALGAR TELECOM S/A | Unclassified | IPv4 IPv6 | 515 |
| AS15830 | Equinix (EMEA) Acquisition Enterprises B.V. | Hosting | IPv4 IPv6 | 251 |
| AS52875 | M.I.MONTREAL INFORMATICA LTDA | Unclassified | IPv4 | 86 |
| AS273490 | FIBRION INTERNET LTDA | Unclassified | IPv4 | 35 |
| AS264223 | MULTIPLIC COMUNICACAO E TECNOLOGIA LTDA -ME | Residential | IPv4 | 25 |
Provenance
Where this comes from
Derived from routing tables collected at 2026-10-23 10:00 UTC by route-views2,rrc00, as seen from 75 BGP vantage points across 73.15M route entries. These are observations from those vantage points, not a complete or authoritative view of the internet.
Inferred from path position, not from any declaration by either party. A network appearing here is carrying these routes; whether that is a paid transit arrangement, a backup, or something else is not something routing data can tell you. Adjacency is not the same as peering. Being next to each other in a path covers paid transit, settlement-free peering and customer connections alike, and routing data cannot distinguish them. Treat this as "these networks exchange routes", nothing more specific.
Cross-check against RIPEstat or BGP.tools, which observe from a different and larger set of vantage points.