Observed topology
AS269561 AS269561 - M.M. Brito da Silva - Multimidia
Unclassified LACNIC Cable/DSL/ISP
Transit
Upstream networks
Networks observed carrying traffic for AS269561: the AS immediately before it in a routing path. Ranked by how many paths showed the relationship, which reflects how widely it is used, not how much traffic crosses it.
| AS | Network | Type | Families | Paths seen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS272501 | Cotia Fiber Telecomunicacoes e Servicos LTDA | Unclassified | IPv4 IPv6 | 94 |
| AS272559 | ULISSES DE OLIVEIRA SANTOS - ME | Unclassified | IPv4 | 92 |
| AS270741 | NossaNeT Fortaleza | Unclassified | IPv4 | 48 |
| AS6939 | Hurricane Electric LLC | Transit | IPv4 IPv6 | 30 |
| AS269375 | SAIONARA FERNANDES DA SILVA | Unclassified | IPv4 | 2 |
Transit
Downstream networks
Networks for which AS269561 was observed as the last hop before the origin, meaning it appears to provide them transit.
No downstream observed. This network does not appear to carry transit for anyone.
Adjacency
Adjacent networks
Every AS seen directly next to AS269561 in a routing path, in either direction.
| AS | Network | Type | Families | Paths seen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS272501 | Cotia Fiber Telecomunicacoes e Servicos LTDA | Unclassified | IPv4 IPv6 | 94 |
| AS272559 | ULISSES DE OLIVEIRA SANTOS - ME | Unclassified | IPv4 | 92 |
| AS270741 | NossaNeT Fortaleza | Unclassified | IPv4 | 48 |
| AS6939 | Hurricane Electric LLC | Transit | IPv4 IPv6 | 30 |
| AS269375 | SAIONARA FERNANDES DA SILVA | Unclassified | IPv4 | 2 |
Provenance
Where this comes from
Derived from routing tables collected at 2026-11-04 10:00 UTC by route-views2,rrc00, as seen from 76 BGP vantage points across 74.33M route entries. These are observations from those vantage points, not a complete or authoritative view of the internet.
Inferred from path position, not from any declaration by either party. A network appearing here is carrying these routes; whether that is a paid transit arrangement, a backup, or something else is not something routing data can tell you. Adjacency is not the same as peering. Being next to each other in a path covers paid transit, settlement-free peering and customer connections alike, and routing data cannot distinguish them. Treat this as "these networks exchange routes", nothing more specific.
Cross-check against RIPEstat or BGP.tools, which observe from a different and larger set of vantage points.