asn.dev

Observed topology

AS269077 VISION TELECOM SERVICOS DE COMUNICACAO MULTIMIDIA

Upstreams 1 carry this network
Downstreams 6 this network carries
Adjacent (IPv4) 6
Adjacent (IPv6) 6

Transit

Upstream networks

inferred

Networks observed carrying traffic for AS269077: the AS immediately before it in a routing path. Ranked by how many paths showed the relationship, which reflects how widely it is used, not how much traffic crosses it.

ASNetworkTypeFamiliesPaths seen
AS266583TELXE DO BRASIL TELECOMUNICACOES LTDAResidentialIPv4 IPv6300

Inferred from path position, not from any declaration by either party. A network appearing here is carrying these routes; whether that is a paid transit arrangement, a backup, or something else is not something routing data can tell you.

Transit

Downstream networks

inferred

Networks for which AS269077 was observed as the last hop before the origin, meaning it appears to provide them transit.

ASNetworkTypeFamiliesPaths seen
AS273781CONECT + FIBRAUnclassifiedIPv6204
AS267127PH TelecomUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv6154
AS264059D.V Comercio em Telecomunicacoes de Rede LTDA-MEUnclassifiedIPv6102
AS266469PROVWEB JANDER FORTES LIMA - MEUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv694
AS52924NEXCESS Solucoes de Redes Ltda.UnclassifiedIPv4 IPv679
AS264289PROVEINTER LTDAUnclassifiedIPv460

Adjacency

Adjacent networks

12 shown

Every AS seen directly next to AS269077 in a routing path, in either direction.

ASNetworkTypeFamiliesPaths seen
AS266583TELXE DO BRASIL TELECOMUNICACOES LTDAResidentialIPv4 IPv61,053
AS273781CONECT + FIBRAUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv6264
AS267127PH TelecomUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv6154
AS264059D.V Comercio em Telecomunicacoes de Rede LTDA-MEUnclassifiedIPv6102
AS266469PROVWEB JANDER FORTES LIMA - MEUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv694
AS52924NEXCESS Solucoes de Redes Ltda.UnclassifiedIPv4 IPv679
AS264289PROVEINTER LTDAUnclassifiedIPv460

Adjacency is not the same as peering. Being next to each other in a path covers paid transit, settlement-free peering and customer connections alike, and routing data cannot distinguish them. Treat this as "these networks exchange routes", nothing more specific.

Interconnection

Exchange presence

recorded

Internet exchanges where Packet Clearing House has a port recorded for AS269077, largest fabric first. An exchange is shared switching where networks interconnect directly rather than paying a transit provider to carry traffic between them, so turning up at one is a deliberate choice about how this network wants to be reached. Each name opens that exchange's own page, with its peering LANs and every other network recorded on it. Recorded at 1 exchange across 1 country and 1 region.

ExchangeLocationTheir addressMember ports
IX.br (PTT.br) ManausManaus, Brazil187.16.198.4869

Unlike the tables above, this is recorded rather than inferred. An address on a peering LAN is at that exchange by definition. Two carve-outs all the same. Member ports counts every participant at the exchange, not this network's ports, so read it as a size proxy. And an absent exchange means PCH has no record of it, not that the network is not there.

Provenance

Where this comes from

Derived from routing tables collected at 2026-08-08 10:00 UTC by route-views2,rrc00, as seen from 75 BGP vantage points across 74.02M route entries. These are observations from those vantage points, not a complete or authoritative view of the internet.

Cross-check against RIPEstat or BGP.tools, which observe from a different and larger set of vantage points.

Exchange presence comes from a separate dataset: the directory collected 2026-08-09 by Packet Clearing House (https://www.pch.net/ixp/data), covering 1,327 exchanges and 93,164 recorded member ports, licensed CC BY-NC-SA 3.0.

PeeringDB is the better-known directory and is deliberately not the source here: its acceptable-use policy forbids the bulk storage this needs. The two answer different questions anyway. PeeringDB reports what an operator declares about itself; this reports what PCH has recorded.