Autonomous system
AS268976 Weclix Telecom SA
Unclassified LACNIC
Interconnection
Peering at a glance
Internet exchanges
Recorded at 3 exchanges in 1 country, largest first.
| Exchange | Location | Their address |
|---|---|---|
| IX.br (PTT.br) São Paulo | São Paulo, Brazil | 187.16.210.124 |
| IX.br (PTT.br) Ribeirão Preto | Ribeirão Preto, Brazil | 200.192.110.21 |
| IX.br (PTT.br) São José do Rio Preto | São José do Rio Preto, Brazil | 187.16.199.13 |
Transit providers
9 upstream, 18 downstream and 49 adjacent networks observed; most-used upstreams first.
Exchange presence is recorded rather than inferred: the directory collected by Packet Clearing House (https://www.pch.net/ixp/data) on 2026-10-11, licensed CC BY-NC-SA 3.0. Transit is inferred from observed BGP paths, never declared by either party.
Address space
Summary
IPv4 40 prefixes · 40.70K addresses IPv6 32 prefixes
| Country | Name | Prefixes |
|---|---|---|
| BR | Brazil | 72 |
Registry
Allocation record
- Registry
- LACNIC
- Handle
268976- Registry name
- ASN268976
- Registrant
- Weclix Telecom S/A
- Abuse contact
- P16 TELECOM LTDA
- Registered
- 2019-05-23
- Last changed
- 2019-05-23
- Allocation
- allocated
Routing security
RPKI and IRR
- RPKI
- 100% valid · 209 valid, 0 with no ROA
- ROAs
- 29 authorising AS268976
- ASPA
- no ASPA record
- IRR
- 100% registered · 209 of 209 announcements
- Route objects
- 169 naming AS268976
Reputation
Classification and threat
Unclassified Not in the curated lists. Most of the ~80,000 allocated ASNs are not.
Spamhaus DROP
Not on ASN-DROP The network as a whole is not listed.
No DROP prefixes None of its announced space is on the DROP prefix list.
Spamhaus DROP ("Don't Route Or Peer") lists space and networks run by, or hijacked for, spam and cybercrime operations: 432 networks and 1,768 prefixes, as published 2026-10-12. A short, high-confidence list, so a match is worth taking seriously, and absence from it says little on its own.
FBI IC3
No IC3 indicators Nothing from the FBI IC3 feed.
IC3 threat data is alpha. Absence of an indicator is not evidence of good behaviour, only of absence from this one feed.
Elsewhere