asn.dev

Autonomous system

AS266390 Tajo Tecnologia Ltda

Unclassified LACNIC

IPv4 addresses 1.02K 3 prefixes
IPv6 prefixes 1 counted as prefixes, not addresses
Countries 1 mostly BR
Exchanges 1 recorded by PCH
Upstreams 1 0 downstream
Flagged prefixes 0 none

Interconnection

Peering at a glance

Full topology · Graph

Internet exchanges

Recorded at 1 exchange in 1 country, largest first.

ExchangeLocationTheir address
FL-IX - The Florida Internet Exchange / Community IX - FloridaMiami, United States206.41.108.100

Transit providers

1 upstream, 0 downstream and 2 adjacent networks observed; most-used upstreams first.

ASNetworkPaths seen
AS267056EVEREST RIDGE DO BRASIL LTDA324

Exchange presence is recorded rather than inferred: the directory collected by Packet Clearing House (https://www.pch.net/ixp/data) on 2026-10-10, licensed CC BY-NC-SA 3.0. Transit is inferred from observed BGP paths, never declared by either party.

Address space

Summary

Shape and geography

IPv4 3 prefixes · 1.02K addresses IPv6 1 prefixes

CountryNamePrefixes
BRBrazil4

Registry

Allocation record

LACNIC · via Atlas (registry data)
Registry
LACNIC
Registered
2016-12-01
Allocation
allocated

Routing security

RPKI and IRR

Full detail
RPKI
0% valid · 0 valid, 6 with no ROA
ROAs
0 authorising AS266390
ASPA
no ASPA record
IRR
100% registered · 6 of 6 announcements
Route objects
9 naming AS266390

Reputation

Classification and threat

Unclassified Not in the curated lists. Most of the ~80,000 allocated ASNs are not.

Spamhaus DROP

Not on ASN-DROP The network as a whole is not listed.

No DROP prefixes None of its announced space is on the DROP prefix list.

Spamhaus DROP ("Don't Route Or Peer") lists space and networks run by, or hijacked for, spam and cybercrime operations: 431 networks and 1,775 prefixes, as published 2026-10-11. A short, high-confidence list, so a match is worth taking seriously, and absence from it says little on its own.

FBI IC3

No IC3 indicators Nothing from the FBI IC3 feed.

IC3 threat data is alpha. Absence of an indicator is not evidence of good behaviour, only of absence from this one feed.

Elsewhere

Cross-check