Observed topology
AS266242 AS266242 - VIANET GUARACIAMA EIRELI ME
Hosting LACNIC Network Services
Transit
Upstream networks
Networks observed carrying traffic for AS266242: the AS immediately before it in a routing path. Ranked by how many paths showed the relationship, which reflects how widely it is used, not how much traffic crosses it.
| AS | Network | Type | Families | Paths seen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS52928 | NORTETEL TELECOMUNICACOES LTDA | Unclassified | IPv4 IPv6 | 484 |
Transit
Downstream networks
Networks for which AS266242 was observed as the last hop before the origin, meaning it appears to provide them transit.
| AS | Network | Type | Families | Paths seen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS269459 | PROVEDOR RODRIGUES FERREIRA LTDA | Unclassified | IPv4 IPv6 | 484 |
| AS61885 | MGNETMOC LTDA | Unclassified | IPv4 IPv6 | 400 |
| AS268667 | NET MAIS SOLUCOES EM REDE LTDA - ME | Unclassified | IPv4 IPv6 | 228 |
| AS267173 | NetMontes Telecomunicacoes e Servicos Ltda | Unclassified | IPv4 | 192 |
| AS271285 | MG TELECOM | Unclassified | IPv4 | 53 |
Adjacency
Adjacent networks
Every AS seen directly next to AS266242 in a routing path, in either direction.
| AS | Network | Type | Families | Paths seen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS52928 | NORTETEL TELECOMUNICACOES LTDA | Unclassified | IPv4 IPv6 | 1,841 |
| AS269459 | PROVEDOR RODRIGUES FERREIRA LTDA | Unclassified | IPv4 IPv6 | 484 |
| AS61885 | MGNETMOC LTDA | Unclassified | IPv4 IPv6 | 400 |
| AS268667 | NET MAIS SOLUCOES EM REDE LTDA - ME | Unclassified | IPv4 IPv6 | 228 |
| AS267173 | NetMontes Telecomunicacoes e Servicos Ltda | Unclassified | IPv4 | 192 |
| AS271285 | MG TELECOM | Unclassified | IPv4 | 53 |
Provenance
Where this comes from
Derived from routing tables collected at 2026-11-12 10:00 UTC by route-views2,rrc00, as seen from 75 BGP vantage points across 74.36M route entries. These are observations from those vantage points, not a complete or authoritative view of the internet.
Inferred from path position, not from any declaration by either party. A network appearing here is carrying these routes; whether that is a paid transit arrangement, a backup, or something else is not something routing data can tell you. Adjacency is not the same as peering. Being next to each other in a path covers paid transit, settlement-free peering and customer connections alike, and routing data cannot distinguish them. Treat this as "these networks exchange routes", nothing more specific.
Cross-check against RIPEstat or BGP.tools, which observe from a different and larger set of vantage points.