Observed topology
AS265139 AS265139 - OXENTE NET EMPREENDIMENTOS LTDA - EPP
Unclassified APNIC Cable/DSL/ISP
Transit
Upstream networks
Networks observed carrying traffic for AS265139: the AS immediately before it in a routing path. Ranked by how many paths showed the relationship, which reflects how widely it is used, not how much traffic crosses it.
| AS | Network | Type | Families | Paths seen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS262494 | Virtex Telecom | Residential | IPv4 IPv6 | 443 |
Transit
Downstream networks
Networks for which AS265139 was observed as the last hop before the origin, meaning it appears to provide them transit.
| AS | Network | Type | Families | Paths seen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS272711 | Provedor Netlink de Campo Alegre de Lourdes LTDA | Unclassified | IPv4 IPv6 | 153 |
| AS268314 | EWERTON DA SILVA LOPES TELECOMUNICACOES | Unclassified | IPv4 IPv6 | 90 |
| AS267567 | Radiun Servicos de Provedor de Internet LTDA | Residential | IPv4 IPv6 | 57 |
| AS273530 | Joao Gomes de Sousa Neto-ME | Unclassified | IPv6 | 32 |
Adjacency
Adjacent networks
Every AS seen directly next to AS265139 in a routing path, in either direction.
| AS | Network | Type | Families | Paths seen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS262494 | Virtex Telecom | Residential | IPv4 IPv6 | 946 |
| AS272711 | Provedor Netlink de Campo Alegre de Lourdes LTDA | Unclassified | IPv4 IPv6 | 267 |
| AS268314 | EWERTON DA SILVA LOPES TELECOMUNICACOES | Unclassified | IPv4 IPv6 | 90 |
| AS273530 | Joao Gomes de Sousa Neto-ME | Unclassified | IPv4 IPv6 | 89 |
| AS267567 | Radiun Servicos de Provedor de Internet LTDA | Residential | IPv4 IPv6 | 57 |
Provenance
Where this comes from
Derived from routing tables collected at 2026-11-07 10:00 UTC by route-views2,rrc00, as seen from 75 BGP vantage points across 72.97M route entries. These are observations from those vantage points, not a complete or authoritative view of the internet.
Inferred from path position, not from any declaration by either party. A network appearing here is carrying these routes; whether that is a paid transit arrangement, a backup, or something else is not something routing data can tell you. Adjacency is not the same as peering. Being next to each other in a path covers paid transit, settlement-free peering and customer connections alike, and routing data cannot distinguish them. Treat this as "these networks exchange routes", nothing more specific.
Cross-check against RIPEstat or BGP.tools, which observe from a different and larger set of vantage points.