Observed topology
AS264963 AS264963 - LUMIAR TELECOMUNICACOES
Residential LACNIC
Transit
Upstream networks
Networks observed carrying traffic for AS264963: the AS immediately before it in a routing path. Ranked by how many paths showed the relationship, which reflects how widely it is used, not how much traffic crosses it.
Transit
Downstream networks
Networks for which AS264963 was observed as the last hop before the origin, meaning it appears to provide them transit.
Adjacency
Adjacent networks
Every AS seen directly next to AS264963 in a routing path, in either direction.
| AS | Network | Type | Families | Paths seen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS61568 | ALOO TELECOM - FSF TECNOLOGIA SA | Residential | IPv4 IPv6 | 481 |
| AS28186 | ITS TELECOMUNICACOES LTDA | Unclassified | IPv4 IPv6 | 236 |
| AS269396 | UNIR TELECOM | Unclassified | IPv4 IPv6 | 166 |
| AS262734 | TUX NET SERVICOS DE INFORMATICA LTDA | Residential | IPv4 IPv6 | 144 |
| AS271130 | WABA PROVEDOR DE INTERNET LTDA | Unclassified | IPv4 | 122 |
| AS265393 | FIRENET SERVICOS DE TELECOMUNICACOES LTDA | Unclassified | IPv6 | 48 |
| AS271042 | BOT INTERNET E SERVICOS DE TELECOMUNICACOES LTDA | Unclassified | IPv6 | 46 |
| AS6939 | Hurricane Electric LLC | Transit | IPv4 IPv6 | 42 |
| AS262999 | IVI TECNOLOGIA E COMUNICACAO LTDA | Unclassified | IPv6 | 30 |
| AS266181 | GOLDEN LINK | Residential | IPv6 | 27 |
Provenance
Where this comes from
Derived from routing tables collected at 2026-11-02 10:00 UTC by route-views2,rrc00, as seen from 76 BGP vantage points across 74.44M route entries. These are observations from those vantage points, not a complete or authoritative view of the internet.
Inferred from path position, not from any declaration by either party. A network appearing here is carrying these routes; whether that is a paid transit arrangement, a backup, or something else is not something routing data can tell you. Adjacency is not the same as peering. Being next to each other in a path covers paid transit, settlement-free peering and customer connections alike, and routing data cannot distinguish them. Treat this as "these networks exchange routes", nothing more specific.
Cross-check against RIPEstat or BGP.tools, which observe from a different and larger set of vantage points.