asn.dev

Observed topology

AS2647 ORANGE-BUSINESS-NAM

Upstreams 1 carry this network
Downstreams 3 this network carries
Adjacent (IPv4) 16
Adjacent (IPv6) 5

Transit

Upstream networks

inferred

Networks observed carrying traffic for AS2647: the AS immediately before it in a routing path. Ranked by how many paths showed the relationship, which reflects how widely it is used, not how much traffic crosses it.

ASNetworkTypeFamiliesPaths seen
AS5511Orange S.A.TransitIPv4732

Inferred from path position, not from any declaration by either party. A network appearing here is carrying these routes; whether that is a paid transit arrangement, a backup, or something else is not something routing data can tell you.

Transit

Downstream networks

inferred

Networks for which AS2647 was observed as the last hop before the origin, meaning it appears to provide them transit.

ASNetworkTypeFamiliesPaths seen
AS51964ORANGE BUSINESS SERVICES U.S. Inc.UnclassifiedIPv4 IPv64,717
AS400692BASF CorporationUnclassifiedIPv410
AS26573Luxoft USA IncUnclassifiedIPv48

Adjacency

Adjacent networks

21 shown

Every AS seen directly next to AS2647 in a routing path, in either direction.

ASNetworkTypeFamiliesPaths seen
AS51964ORANGE BUSINESS SERVICES U.S. Inc.UnclassifiedIPv4 IPv65,074
AS5511Orange S.A.TransitIPv4 IPv62,737
AS6461Zayo BandwidthTransitIPv4 IPv61,676
AS6939Hurricane Electric LLCTransitIPv4 IPv6871
AS22652Videotron LteeResidentialIPv4 IPv6122
AS37721Virtual Technologies & SolutionsResidentialIPv471
AS293ESnetUnclassifiedIPv469
AS24482SG.GSHostingIPv467
AS2497Internet Initiative Japan Inc.UnclassifiedIPv463
AS394256Tech Futures Interactive Inc.UnclassifiedIPv454
AS14907Wikimedia Foundation Inc.HostingIPv452
AS852TELUS Communications Inc.ResidentialIPv432
AS400692BASF CorporationUnclassifiedIPv410
AS26573Luxoft USA IncUnclassifiedIPv48
AS15412Flag Telecom UK LimitedUnclassifiedIPv46
AS5405Inter.link GmbHUnclassifiedIPv44

Adjacency is not the same as peering. Being next to each other in a path covers paid transit, settlement-free peering and customer connections alike, and routing data cannot distinguish them. Treat this as "these networks exchange routes", nothing more specific.

Interconnection

Exchange presence

recorded

Internet exchanges where Packet Clearing House has a port recorded for AS2647, largest fabric first. An exchange is shared switching where networks interconnect directly rather than paying a transit provider to carry traffic between them, so turning up at one is a deliberate choice about how this network wants to be reached. Each name opens that exchange's own page, with its peering LANs and every other network recorded on it. Recorded at 9 exchanges across 2 countries and 1 region.

ExchangeLocationTheir addressMember ports
Equinix Internet Exchange AshburnAshburn, United States206.126.236.153388
Toronto Internet ExchangeToronto, Canada206.108.35.231286
Equinix Internet Exchange ChicagoChicago, United States208.115.136.160280
Equinix Internet Exchange DallasDallas, United States206.223.119.137225
Equinix Internet Exchange San Jose (Bay Area)San Jose, United States206.223.117.33193
Equinix Internet Exchange MiamiMiami, United States198.32.243.187175
Equinix Internet Exchange Palo AltoPalo Alto, United States198.32.176.14076
Equinix IBX Secaucus retiredSecaucus, United States206.223.117.3364
Equinix-LA(former Paix) retiredLos Angeles, United States198.32.243.187

Unlike the tables above, this is recorded rather than inferred. An address on a peering LAN is at that exchange by definition. Two carve-outs all the same. Member ports counts every participant at the exchange, not this network's ports, so read it as a size proxy. And an absent exchange means PCH has no record of it, not that the network is not there.

Provenance

Where this comes from

Derived from routing tables collected at 2026-08-08 10:00 UTC by route-views2,rrc00, as seen from 75 BGP vantage points across 74.02M route entries. These are observations from those vantage points, not a complete or authoritative view of the internet.

Cross-check against RIPEstat or BGP.tools, which observe from a different and larger set of vantage points.

Exchange presence comes from a separate dataset: the directory collected 2026-08-09 by Packet Clearing House (https://www.pch.net/ixp/data), covering 1,327 exchanges and 93,164 recorded member ports, licensed CC BY-NC-SA 3.0.

PeeringDB is the better-known directory and is deliberately not the source here: its acceptable-use policy forbids the bulk storage this needs. The two answer different questions anyway. PeeringDB reports what an operator declares about itself; this reports what PCH has recorded.