Observed topology
AS262540 CBNET TELECOM EIRELI
Unclassified LACNIC
Transit
Upstream networks
Networks observed carrying traffic for AS262540: the AS immediately before it in a routing path. Ranked by how many paths showed the relationship, which reflects how widely it is used, not how much traffic crosses it.
| AS | Network | Type | Families | Paths seen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS268171 | Meganet Tecnologia LTDA | Unclassified | IPv4 | 657 |
| AS52468 | UFINET PANAMA S.A. | Unclassified | IPv4 IPv6 | 157 |
| AS6939 | Hurricane Electric LLC | Transit | IPv4 IPv6 | 57 |
| AS269039 | DENISE DE OLIVEIRA SILVA | Unclassified | IPv4 | 42 |
| AS24482 | SG.GS | Hosting | IPv4 IPv6 | 5 |
| AS37721 | Virtual Technologies & Solutions | Residential | IPv4 | 4 |
Transit
Downstream networks
Networks for which AS262540 was observed as the last hop before the origin, meaning it appears to provide them transit.
| AS | Network | Type | Families | Paths seen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS268171 | Meganet Tecnologia LTDA | Unclassified | IPv4 | 60 |
Adjacency
Adjacent networks
Every AS seen directly next to AS262540 in a routing path, in either direction.
| AS | Network | Type | Families | Paths seen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS268171 | Meganet Tecnologia LTDA | Unclassified | IPv4 | 717 |
| AS52468 | UFINET PANAMA S.A. | Unclassified | IPv4 IPv6 | 217 |
| AS6939 | Hurricane Electric LLC | Transit | IPv4 IPv6 | 57 |
| AS269039 | DENISE DE OLIVEIRA SILVA | Unclassified | IPv4 | 42 |
| AS24482 | SG.GS | Hosting | IPv4 IPv6 | 5 |
| AS37721 | Virtual Technologies & Solutions | Residential | IPv4 | 4 |
Provenance
Where this comes from
Derived from routing tables collected at 2026-10-22 10:00 UTC by route-views2,rrc00, as seen from 75 BGP vantage points across 73.12M route entries. These are observations from those vantage points, not a complete or authoritative view of the internet.
Inferred from path position, not from any declaration by either party. A network appearing here is carrying these routes; whether that is a paid transit arrangement, a backup, or something else is not something routing data can tell you. Adjacency is not the same as peering. Being next to each other in a path covers paid transit, settlement-free peering and customer connections alike, and routing data cannot distinguish them. Treat this as "these networks exchange routes", nothing more specific.
Cross-check against RIPEstat or BGP.tools, which observe from a different and larger set of vantage points.