Autonomous system
AS216246 RU-AEZA-AS
Unclassified Spamhaus ASN-DROP RIPE
Interconnection
Peering at a glance
Internet exchanges
No exchange port on file. Many exchanges publish no participant list, so this is not proof of absence.
Transit providers
14 upstream, 2 downstream and 26 adjacent networks observed; most-used upstreams first.
Exchange presence is recorded rather than inferred: the directory collected by Packet Clearing House (https://www.pch.net/ixp/data) on 2026-10-15, licensed CC BY-NC-SA 3.0. Transit is inferred from observed BGP paths, never declared by either party.
Address space
Summary
IPv4 35 prefixes · 13.82K addresses IPv6 3 prefixes
| Country | Name | Prefixes |
|---|---|---|
| RU | Russian Federation | 38 |
Registry
Allocation record
- Registry
- RIPE
- Handle
AS216246- Registry name
- RU-AEZA-AS
- Registrant
- aeza-mnt
- Abuse contact
- support@aeza.ru
- Registered
- 2023-09-27
- Last changed
- 2026-09-28
- Allocation
- allocated
Routing security
RPKI and IRR
- RPKI
- 92% valid · 60 valid, 5 with no ROA
- ROAs
- 57 authorising AS216246
- ASPA
- no ASPA record
- IRR
- 100% registered · 65 of 65 announcements
- Route objects
- 70 naming AS216246
Reputation
Classification and threat
Unclassified Not in the curated lists. Most of the ~80,000 allocated ASNs are not.
Spamhaus DROP
On Spamhaus ASN-DROP Spamhaus lists this entire
network (associated domain aeza.net)
as controlled by, or hijacked for, cybercrime. Many operators null-route
everything it originates.
1 DROP match Announced space overlapping the DROP prefix list.
| Announced | DROP entry | Record |
|---|---|---|
| 193.233.248.0/22 | 193.233.248.0/22 | SBL686883 |
Spamhaus DROP ("Don't Route Or Peer") lists space and networks run by, or hijacked for, spam and cybercrime operations: 442 networks and 1,782 prefixes, as published 2026-10-16. A short, high-confidence list, so a match is worth taking seriously, and absence from it says little on its own.
FBI IC3
No IC3 indicators Nothing from the FBI IC3 feed.
IC3 threat data is alpha. Absence of an indicator is not evidence of good behaviour, only of absence from this one feed.
Elsewhere