Observed topology
AS21488 EMPLOT-AS EMPLOT LTD
Unclassified APNIC
Transit
Upstream networks
Networks observed carrying traffic for AS21488: the AS immediately before it in a routing path. Ranked by how many paths showed the relationship, which reflects how widely it is used, not how much traffic crosses it.
| AS | Network | Type | Families | Paths seen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS174 | Cogent Communications, LLC | Transit | IPv4 IPv6 | 148 |
| AS3356 | Level 3 Parent, LLC | Transit | IPv4 IPv6 | 64 |
| AS6939 | Hurricane Electric LLC | Transit | IPv4 IPv6 | 47 |
| AS3257 | GTT Communications Inc. | Transit | IPv4 | 4 |
| AS3303 | Swisscom (Schweiz) AG | Residential | IPv4 | 4 |
| AS29632 | Netassist International EOOD | Unclassified | IPv6 | 2 |
Transit
Downstream networks
Networks for which AS21488 was observed as the last hop before the origin, meaning it appears to provide them transit.
| AS | Network | Type | Families | Paths seen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS43145 | RNC Ltd. | Unclassified | IPv4 | 649 |
| AS57270 | FOP Kushnir Aleksandr Andreevich | Unclassified | IPv4 | 232 |
| AS48239 | Scientific-Production Enterprise Information Technologies Ltd | Unclassified | IPv4 | 199 |
| AS41586 | Ukrainian Internet Company LLC | Unclassified | IPv4 | 180 |
| AS56527 | Information-Transport Network Company ltd. | Unclassified | IPv4 | 177 |
| AS29637 | Digital Optical Communications LTD | Unclassified | IPv4 | 118 |
| AS51875 | COMMERCIAL COMPANY SILVER SERVICE LLC | Unclassified | IPv4 | 118 |
| AS42068 | LLC "Persha Studia" Development" | Unclassified | IPv4 | 102 |
| AS47403 | I-Link LLC | Unclassified | IPv4 | 59 |
| AS50899 | Oliynyk Tetiana trading as FOP Oliynyk | Unclassified | IPv4 | 58 |
Adjacency
Adjacent networks
Every AS seen directly next to AS21488 in a routing path, in either direction.
| AS | Network | Type | Families | Paths seen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS174 | Cogent Communications, LLC | Transit | IPv4 IPv6 | 1,984 |
| AS48239 | Scientific-Production Enterprise Information Technologies Ltd | Unclassified | IPv4 | 765 |
| AS43145 | RNC Ltd. | Unclassified | IPv4 | 649 |
| AS3356 | Level 3 Parent, LLC | Transit | IPv4 IPv6 | 633 |
| AS6939 | Hurricane Electric LLC | Transit | IPv4 IPv6 | 302 |
| AS57270 | FOP Kushnir Aleksandr Andreevich | Unclassified | IPv4 | 232 |
| AS41586 | Ukrainian Internet Company LLC | Unclassified | IPv4 | 180 |
| AS56527 | Information-Transport Network Company ltd. | Unclassified | IPv4 | 177 |
| AS29637 | Digital Optical Communications LTD | Unclassified | IPv4 | 118 |
| AS51875 | COMMERCIAL COMPANY SILVER SERVICE LLC | Unclassified | IPv4 | 118 |
Provenance
Where this comes from
Derived from routing tables collected at 2026-10-11 10:00 UTC by route-views2,rrc00, as seen from 75 BGP vantage points across 73.47M route entries. These are observations from those vantage points, not a complete or authoritative view of the internet.
Inferred from path position, not from any declaration by either party. A network appearing here is carrying these routes; whether that is a paid transit arrangement, a backup, or something else is not something routing data can tell you. Adjacency is not the same as peering. Being next to each other in a path covers paid transit, settlement-free peering and customer connections alike, and routing data cannot distinguish them. Treat this as "these networks exchange routes", nothing more specific.
Cross-check against RIPEstat or BGP.tools, which observe from a different and larger set of vantage points.