Autonomous system
AS210558 SERVICES-1337-GMBH 1337-SERVICES-GMBH-NETWORK
Hosting Spamhaus ASN-DROP RIPE
Interconnection
Peering at a glance
Internet exchanges
Recorded at 1 exchange in 1 country, largest first.
| Exchange | Location | Their address |
|---|---|---|
| ERA-IX Amsterdam | Amsterdam, Netherlands | 185.1.240.92 |
Transit providers
9 upstream, 0 downstream and 11 adjacent networks observed; most-used upstreams first.
Exchange presence is recorded rather than inferred: the directory collected by Packet Clearing House (https://www.pch.net/ixp/data) on 2026-10-13, licensed CC BY-NC-SA 3.0. Transit is inferred from observed BGP paths, never declared by either party.
Address space
Summary
IPv4 31 prefixes · 6.14K addresses IPv6 4 prefixes
| Country | Name | Prefixes |
|---|---|---|
| DE | Germany | 35 |
Registry
Allocation record
- Registry
- RIPE
- Handle
AS210558- Registry name
- services-1337-gmbh
- Registrant
- lir-de-1337services-1-MNT
- Abuse contact
- abuse@as210558.net
- Registered
- 2021-10-28
- Last changed
- 2026-08-27
- Allocation
- allocated
Routing security
RPKI and IRR
- RPKI
- 100% valid · 31 valid, 0 with no ROA
- ROAs
- 35 authorising AS210558
- ASPA
- no ASPA record
- IRR
- 100% registered · 31 of 31 announcements
- Route objects
- 38 naming AS210558
Reputation
Classification and threat
Hosting Datacenter or cloud provider. Addresses are servers, not people.
Spamhaus DROP
On Spamhaus ASN-DROP Spamhaus lists this entire
network (associated domain as210558.net)
as controlled by, or hijacked for, cybercrime. Many operators null-route
everything it originates.
34 DROP matches Announced space overlapping the DROP prefix list.
Spamhaus DROP ("Don't Route Or Peer") lists space and networks run by, or hijacked for, spam and cybercrime operations: 436 networks and 1,771 prefixes, as published 2026-10-13. A short, high-confidence list, so a match is worth taking seriously, and absence from it says little on its own.
FBI IC3
No IC3 indicators Nothing from the FBI IC3 feed.
IC3 threat data is alpha. Absence of an indicator is not evidence of good behaviour, only of absence from this one feed.
Elsewhere