asn.dev

Observed topology

AS210316 ELEKOMS-AS

Upstreams 1 carry this network
Downstreams 11 this network carries
Adjacent (IPv4) 2
Adjacent (IPv6) 11

Transit

Upstream networks

inferred

Networks observed carrying traffic for AS210316: the AS immediately before it in a routing path. Ranked by how many paths showed the relationship, which reflects how widely it is used, not how much traffic crosses it.

ASNetworkTypeFamiliesPaths seen
AS3356Level 3 Parent, LLCTransitIPv4 IPv6188

Inferred from path position, not from any declaration by either party. A network appearing here is carrying these routes; whether that is a paid transit arrangement, a backup, or something else is not something routing data can tell you.

Transit

Downstream networks

inferred

Networks for which AS210316 was observed as the last hop before the origin, meaning it appears to provide them transit.

ASNetworkTypeFamiliesPaths seen
AS202502LLC "ATOM3"UnclassifiedIPv4360
AS201572ECO-INITIATIVE LLCUnclassifiedIPv664
AS202171PP "TORERO"UnclassifiedIPv632
AS202144TOV CHEMPIRUnclassifiedIPv632
AS201836Garant-Plus-Inform LLCUnclassifiedIPv632
AS201380LLC "Alfa Biznes"UnclassifiedIPv632
AS201292Agrofirma Aleks PPUnclassifiedIPv632
AS212651D-CONECT LLCUnclassifiedIPv632
AS212622LIVE COMM LLCUnclassifiedIPv632
AS200499Enterprises Holding LTDUnclassifiedIPv632
AS202388KP "CLUB NADIYA"UnclassifiedIPv632

Adjacency

Adjacent networks

13 shown

Every AS seen directly next to AS210316 in a routing path, in either direction.

ASNetworkTypeFamiliesPaths seen
AS3356Level 3 Parent, LLCTransitIPv4 IPv6900
AS202502LLC "ATOM3"UnclassifiedIPv4360
AS201572ECO-INITIATIVE LLCUnclassifiedIPv664
AS201836Garant-Plus-Inform LLCUnclassifiedIPv632
AS201380LLC "Alfa Biznes"UnclassifiedIPv632
AS201292Agrofirma Aleks PPUnclassifiedIPv632
AS212651D-CONECT LLCUnclassifiedIPv632
AS212622LIVE COMM LLCUnclassifiedIPv632
AS200499Enterprises Holding LTDUnclassifiedIPv632
AS202171PP "TORERO"UnclassifiedIPv632
AS202144TOV CHEMPIRUnclassifiedIPv632
AS202388KP "CLUB NADIYA"UnclassifiedIPv632

Adjacency is not the same as peering. Being next to each other in a path covers paid transit, settlement-free peering and customer connections alike, and routing data cannot distinguish them. Treat this as "these networks exchange routes", nothing more specific.

Interconnection

Exchange presence

recorded

Internet exchanges where Packet Clearing House has a port recorded for AS210316, largest fabric first. An exchange is shared switching where networks interconnect directly rather than paying a transit provider to carry traffic between them, so turning up at one is a deliberate choice about how this network wants to be reached. Each name opens that exchange's own page, with its peering LANs and every other network recorded on it.

No exchange membership on file. That is not the same as peering nowhere: the dataset records what PCH has collected, and many exchanges publish no participant list at all.

Unlike the tables above, this is recorded rather than inferred. An address on a peering LAN is at that exchange by definition. Two carve-outs all the same. Member ports counts every participant at the exchange, not this network's ports, so read it as a size proxy. And an absent exchange means PCH has no record of it, not that the network is not there.

Provenance

Where this comes from

Derived from routing tables collected at 2026-08-09 10:00 UTC by route-views2,rrc00, as seen from 75 BGP vantage points across 74.03M route entries. These are observations from those vantage points, not a complete or authoritative view of the internet.

Cross-check against RIPEstat or BGP.tools, which observe from a different and larger set of vantage points.

Exchange presence comes from a separate dataset: the directory collected 2026-08-09 by Packet Clearing House (https://www.pch.net/ixp/data), covering 1,327 exchanges and 93,164 recorded member ports, licensed CC BY-NC-SA 3.0.

PeeringDB is the better-known directory and is deliberately not the source here: its acceptable-use policy forbids the bulk storage this needs. The two answer different questions anyway. PeeringDB reports what an operator declares about itself; this reports what PCH has recorded.