asn.dev

Observed topology

AS209030 KL-KDP

Upstreams 8 carry this network
Downstreams 10 this network carries
Adjacent (IPv4) 20
Adjacent (IPv6) 0

Transit

Upstream networks

inferred

Networks observed carrying traffic for AS209030: the AS immediately before it in a routing path. Ranked by how many paths showed the relationship, which reflects how widely it is used, not how much traffic crosses it.

ASNetworkTypeFamiliesPaths seen
AS9002RETN LimitedUnclassifiedIPv4106
AS3216PJSC "Vimpelcom"MobileIPv484
AS20764CJSC RASCOMUnclassifiedIPv468
AS12389PJSC RostelecomResidentialIPv435
AS3327CITIC Telecom CPC Netherlands B.V.UnclassifiedIPv415
AS57463NetIX Communications JSCUnclassifiedIPv41
AS24482SG.GSHostingIPv41
AS49673Truenetwork LLCUnclassifiedIPv41

Inferred from path position, not from any declaration by either party. A network appearing here is carrying these routes; whether that is a paid transit arrangement, a backup, or something else is not something routing data can tell you.

Transit

Downstream networks

inferred

Networks for which AS209030 was observed as the last hop before the origin, meaning it appears to provide them transit.

ASNetworkTypeFamiliesPaths seen
AS34887Information Technology Center of the Republic of Tatarstan GUPUnclassifiedIPv4248
AS60388JSC "Oil Transportation and Production Telecommunications"ResidentialIPv4186
AS203972LLC TatAISneftUnclassifiedIPv4186
AS200107Kaspersky Lab Switzerland GmbHUnclassifiedIPv4186
AS15632JSC "Alfa-Bank"UnclassifiedIPv4186
AS44915All-Russian Regional Development Bank JSCUnclassifiedIPv4124
AS8484Novye oblachnye technologii LLCUnclassifiedIPv462
AS59434JSC "The Auction house of the Russian Federation"UnclassifiedIPv462
AS196699Russ Outdoor LLCUnclassifiedIPv462
AS50586CMRBank (LLC)UnclassifiedIPv462

Adjacency

Adjacent networks

20 shown

Every AS seen directly next to AS209030 in a routing path, in either direction.

ASNetworkTypeFamiliesPaths seen
AS3216PJSC "Vimpelcom"MobileIPv4553
AS9002RETN LimitedUnclassifiedIPv4498
AS20764CJSC RASCOMUnclassifiedIPv4367
AS34887Information Technology Center of the Republic of Tatarstan GUPUnclassifiedIPv4248
AS200107Kaspersky Lab Switzerland GmbHUnclassifiedIPv4186
AS60388JSC "Oil Transportation and Production Telecommunications"ResidentialIPv4186
AS15632JSC "Alfa-Bank"UnclassifiedIPv4186
AS203972LLC TatAISneftUnclassifiedIPv4186
AS6939Hurricane Electric LLCTransitIPv4160
AS44915All-Russian Regional Development Bank JSCUnclassifiedIPv4124
AS50586CMRBank (LLC)UnclassifiedIPv462
AS8484Novye oblachnye technologii LLCUnclassifiedIPv462
AS59434JSC "The Auction house of the Russian Federation"UnclassifiedIPv462
AS196699Russ Outdoor LLCUnclassifiedIPv462
AS12389PJSC RostelecomResidentialIPv435
AS24482SG.GSHostingIPv423
AS37721Virtual Technologies & SolutionsResidentialIPv422
AS3327CITIC Telecom CPC Netherlands B.V.UnclassifiedIPv415
AS49673Truenetwork LLCUnclassifiedIPv41
AS57463NetIX Communications JSCUnclassifiedIPv41

Adjacency is not the same as peering. Being next to each other in a path covers paid transit, settlement-free peering and customer connections alike, and routing data cannot distinguish them. Treat this as "these networks exchange routes", nothing more specific.

Interconnection

Exchange presence

recorded

Internet exchanges where Packet Clearing House has a port recorded for AS209030, largest fabric first. An exchange is shared switching where networks interconnect directly rather than paying a transit provider to carry traffic between them, so turning up at one is a deliberate choice about how this network wants to be reached. Each name opens that exchange's own page, with its peering LANs and every other network recorded on it. Recorded at 1 exchange across 1 country and 1 region.

ExchangeLocationTheir addressMember ports
MSK-IX MoscowMoscow, Russia195.208.209.252498

Unlike the tables above, this is recorded rather than inferred. An address on a peering LAN is at that exchange by definition. Two carve-outs all the same. Member ports counts every participant at the exchange, not this network's ports, so read it as a size proxy. And an absent exchange means PCH has no record of it, not that the network is not there.

Provenance

Where this comes from

Derived from routing tables collected at 2026-08-08 10:00 UTC by route-views2,rrc00, as seen from 75 BGP vantage points across 74.02M route entries. These are observations from those vantage points, not a complete or authoritative view of the internet.

Cross-check against RIPEstat or BGP.tools, which observe from a different and larger set of vantage points.

Exchange presence comes from a separate dataset: the directory collected 2026-08-09 by Packet Clearing House (https://www.pch.net/ixp/data), covering 1,327 exchanges and 93,164 recorded member ports, licensed CC BY-NC-SA 3.0.

PeeringDB is the better-known directory and is deliberately not the source here: its acceptable-use policy forbids the bulk storage this needs. The two answer different questions anyway. PeeringDB reports what an operator declares about itself; this reports what PCH has recorded.