asn.dev

Observed topology

AS209022 TSCHAJERA-LIMITED

Upstreams 19 carry this network
Downstreams 10 this network carries
Adjacent (IPv4) 11
Adjacent (IPv6) 24

Transit

Upstream networks

inferred

Networks observed carrying traffic for AS209022: the AS immediately before it in a routing path. Ranked by how many paths showed the relationship, which reflects how widely it is used, not how much traffic crosses it.

ASNetworkTypeFamiliesPaths seen
AS6939Hurricane Electric LLCTransitIPv6307
AS34927iFog GmbHHostingIPv6111
AS1299Arelion Sweden ABTransitIPv4 IPv668
AS174Cogent Communications, LLCTransitIPv4 IPv661
AS29632Netassist International EOODUnclassifiedIPv624
AS205794JINZE YANGUnclassifiedIPv615
AS24482SG.GSHostingIPv4 IPv615
AS48185team.blue NVUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv613
AS3333Reseaux IP Europeens Network Coordination Centre (RIPE NCC)UnclassifiedIPv4 IPv613
AS204092Association GRIFONUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv613
AS58057Securebit AGUnclassifiedIPv63
AS12586GHOSTnet GmbHHostingIPv63
AS50673Serverius Holding B.V.UnclassifiedIPv42
AS17639Converge ICT Solutions Inc.UnclassifiedIPv61
AS37721Virtual Technologies & SolutionsResidentialIPv41
AS6696VERIXI SAUnclassifiedIPv41
AS20485Joint Stock Company TransTeleComUnclassifiedIPv41
AS56655Gigahost ASUnclassifiedIPv61
AS37100SEACOM LimitedUnclassifiedIPv41

Inferred from path position, not from any declaration by either party. A network appearing here is carrying these routes; whether that is a paid transit arrangement, a backup, or something else is not something routing data can tell you.

Transit

Downstream networks

inferred

Networks for which AS209022 was observed as the last hop before the origin, meaning it appears to provide them transit.

ASNetworkTypeFamiliesPaths seen
AS214006Maartje EyskensUnclassifiedIPv622
AS215223Mohammad RaskaUnclassifiedIPv621
AS200586ahmad munirUnclassifiedIPv619
AS202929Olaf LienauUnclassifiedIPv612
AS209718Jori VannesteUnclassifiedIPv611
AS204438Ruben GarbadeUnclassifiedIPv68
AS149476iFog GmbHUnclassifiedIPv64
AS209833Aroga GmbHUnclassifiedIPv64
AS214147Ka Ho NgUnclassifiedIPv62
AS205848Dominik PohlHostingIPv62

Adjacency

Adjacent networks

35 shown

Every AS seen directly next to AS209022 in a routing path, in either direction.

ASNetworkTypeFamiliesPaths seen
AS6939Hurricane Electric LLCTransitIPv6325
AS34927iFog GmbHHostingIPv6117
AS1299Arelion Sweden ABTransitIPv4 IPv681
AS174Cogent Communications, LLCTransitIPv4 IPv679
AS29632Netassist International EOODUnclassifiedIPv642
AS3333Reseaux IP Europeens Network Coordination Centre (RIPE NCC)UnclassifiedIPv4 IPv628
AS204092Association GRIFONUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv624
AS214006Maartje EyskensUnclassifiedIPv622
AS215223Mohammad RaskaUnclassifiedIPv621
AS200586ahmad munirUnclassifiedIPv619
AS205794JINZE YANGUnclassifiedIPv615
AS24482SG.GSHostingIPv4 IPv615
AS48185team.blue NVUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv613
AS202929Olaf LienauUnclassifiedIPv612
AS209718Jori VannesteUnclassifiedIPv611
AS204438Ruben GarbadeUnclassifiedIPv68
AS17639Converge ICT Solutions Inc.UnclassifiedIPv67
AS149476iFog GmbHUnclassifiedIPv64
AS209833Aroga GmbHUnclassifiedIPv64
AS12586GHOSTnet GmbHHostingIPv63
AS58057Securebit AGUnclassifiedIPv63
AS50673Serverius Holding B.V.UnclassifiedIPv42
AS205848Dominik PohlHostingIPv62
AS214147Ka Ho NgUnclassifiedIPv62
AS56655Gigahost ASUnclassifiedIPv61
AS37100SEACOM LimitedUnclassifiedIPv41
AS20485Joint Stock Company TransTeleComUnclassifiedIPv41
AS6696VERIXI SAUnclassifiedIPv41
AS37721Virtual Technologies & SolutionsResidentialIPv41

Adjacency is not the same as peering. Being next to each other in a path covers paid transit, settlement-free peering and customer connections alike, and routing data cannot distinguish them. Treat this as "these networks exchange routes", nothing more specific.

Interconnection

Exchange presence

recorded

Internet exchanges where Packet Clearing House has a port recorded for AS209022, largest fabric first. An exchange is shared switching where networks interconnect directly rather than paying a transit provider to carry traffic between them, so turning up at one is a deliberate choice about how this network wants to be reached. Each name opens that exchange's own page, with its peering LANs and every other network recorded on it. Recorded at 5 exchanges across 4 countries and 2 regions.

ExchangeLocationTheir addressMember ports
Neutral Internet ExchangeAmsterdam, Netherlands193.239.116.139665
KleyReX Internet ExchangeFrankfurt, Germany193.189.82.24475
Local Internet Exchange FrankfurtFrankfurt, Germany185.1.166.143223
UNMETERED ExchangeVancouver, Canada192.34.27.21128
CH Swiss Internet ExchangeZurich, Switzerland2001:7f8:cc:333:0:20:9022:1111

Unlike the tables above, this is recorded rather than inferred. An address on a peering LAN is at that exchange by definition. Two carve-outs all the same. Member ports counts every participant at the exchange, not this network's ports, so read it as a size proxy. And an absent exchange means PCH has no record of it, not that the network is not there.

Provenance

Where this comes from

Derived from routing tables collected at 2026-08-08 10:00 UTC by route-views2,rrc00, as seen from 75 BGP vantage points across 74.02M route entries. These are observations from those vantage points, not a complete or authoritative view of the internet.

Cross-check against RIPEstat or BGP.tools, which observe from a different and larger set of vantage points.

Exchange presence comes from a separate dataset: the directory collected 2026-08-08 by Packet Clearing House (https://www.pch.net/ixp/data), covering 1,327 exchanges and 93,137 recorded member ports, licensed CC BY-NC-SA 3.0.

PeeringDB is the better-known directory and is deliberately not the source here: its acceptable-use policy forbids the bulk storage this needs. The two answer different questions anyway. PeeringDB reports what an operator declares about itself; this reports what PCH has recorded.