Autonomous system
AS203963 RUBIKDC
Unclassified DROP-listed space RIPE
Interconnection
Peering at a glance
Internet exchanges
No exchange port on file. Many exchanges publish no participant list, so this is not proof of absence.
Transit providers
1 upstream, 0 downstream and 1 adjacent networks observed; most-used upstreams first.
| AS | Network | Paths seen |
|---|---|---|
| AS9009 | M247 Europe SRL | 1,436 |
Exchange presence is recorded rather than inferred: the directory collected by Packet Clearing House (https://www.pch.net/ixp/data) on 2026-10-14, licensed CC BY-NC-SA 3.0. Transit is inferred from observed BGP paths, never declared by either party.
Address space
Summary
IPv4 17 prefixes · 7.68K addresses IPv6 0 prefixes
| Country | Name | Prefixes |
|---|---|---|
| TR | Turkey | 17 |
Registry
Allocation record
- Registry
- RIPE
- Handle
AS203963- Registry name
- RubikDC
- Registrant
- SPDNet Telekomunikasyon Hizmetleri Bilgi Teknolojileri Taahhut Sanayi Ve Ticaret A.S.
- Abuse contact
- abuse@spd.net.tr
- Registered
- 2015-09-23
- Last changed
- 2026-04-28
- Allocation
- allocated
Routing security
RPKI and IRR
- RPKI
- 83% valid · 20 valid, 4 with no ROA
- ROAs
- 22 authorising AS203963
- ASPA
- no ASPA record
- IRR
- 83% registered · 20 of 24 announcements
- Route objects
- 34 naming AS203963
Reputation
Classification and threat
Unclassified Not in the curated lists. Most of the ~80,000 allocated ASNs are not.
Spamhaus DROP
Not on ASN-DROP The network as a whole is not listed.
1 DROP match Announced space overlapping the DROP prefix list.
| Announced | DROP entry | Record |
|---|---|---|
| 167.253.50.0/24 | 167.253.48.0/22 | SBL699892 |
Spamhaus DROP ("Don't Route Or Peer") lists space and networks run by, or hijacked for, spam and cybercrime operations: 442 networks and 1,773 prefixes, as published 2026-10-13. A short, high-confidence list, so a match is worth taking seriously, and absence from it says little on its own.
FBI IC3
No IC3 indicators Nothing from the FBI IC3 feed.
IC3 threat data is alpha. Absence of an indicator is not evidence of good behaviour, only of absence from this one feed.
Elsewhere