asn.dev

Observed topology

AS202246 VALOO

Upstreams 11 carry this network
Downstreams 2 this network carries
Adjacent (IPv4) 13
Adjacent (IPv6) 6

Transit

Upstream networks

inferred

Networks observed carrying traffic for AS202246: the AS immediately before it in a routing path. Ranked by how many paths showed the relationship, which reflects how widely it is used, not how much traffic crosses it.

ASNetworkTypeFamiliesPaths seen
AS6939Hurricane Electric LLCTransitIPv4 IPv6392
AS12552GlobalConnect ABUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv6243
AS1299Arelion Sweden ABTransitIPv4 IPv6198
AS6667Elisa OyjResidentialIPv425
AS24482SG.GSHostingIPv4 IPv618
AS50304Blix Solutions ASUnclassifiedIPv413
AS33891Core-Backbone GmbHHostingIPv412
AS20764CJSC RASCOMUnclassifiedIPv49
AS5405Inter.link GmbHUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv68
AS57463NetIX Communications JSCUnclassifiedIPv45
AS35280F5 Networks SARLHostingIPv44

Inferred from path position, not from any declaration by either party. A network appearing here is carrying these routes; whether that is a paid transit arrangement, a backup, or something else is not something routing data can tell you.

Transit

Downstream networks

inferred

Networks for which AS202246 was observed as the last hop before the origin, meaning it appears to provide them transit.

ASNetworkTypeFamiliesPaths seen
AS20798EPTE OyUnclassifiedIPv438
AS51319KajoNet OyUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv625

Adjacency

Adjacent networks

19 shown

Every AS seen directly next to AS202246 in a routing path, in either direction.

ASNetworkTypeFamiliesPaths seen
AS6939Hurricane Electric LLCTransitIPv4 IPv6403
AS12552GlobalConnect ABUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv6287
AS1299Arelion Sweden ABTransitIPv4 IPv6218
AS51319KajoNet OyUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv644
AS20798EPTE OyUnclassifiedIPv438
AS6667Elisa OyjResidentialIPv425
AS24482SG.GSHostingIPv4 IPv619
AS50304Blix Solutions ASUnclassifiedIPv414
AS33891Core-Backbone GmbHHostingIPv412
AS20764CJSC RASCOMUnclassifiedIPv410
AS57463NetIX Communications JSCUnclassifiedIPv49
AS5405Inter.link GmbHUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv68
AS35280F5 Networks SARLHostingIPv44

Adjacency is not the same as peering. Being next to each other in a path covers paid transit, settlement-free peering and customer connections alike, and routing data cannot distinguish them. Treat this as "these networks exchange routes", nothing more specific.

Interconnection

Exchange presence

recorded

Internet exchanges where Packet Clearing House has a port recorded for AS202246, largest fabric first. An exchange is shared switching where networks interconnect directly rather than paying a transit provider to carry traffic between them, so turning up at one is a deliberate choice about how this network wants to be reached. Each name opens that exchange's own page, with its peering LANs and every other network recorded on it. Recorded at 2 exchanges across 1 country and 1 region.

ExchangeLocationTheir addressMember ports
Netnod StockholmStockholm, Sweden195.69.119.19777
Netnod Sundsvall- GävleSundsvall, Sweden194.68.128.19718

Unlike the tables above, this is recorded rather than inferred. An address on a peering LAN is at that exchange by definition. Two carve-outs all the same. Member ports counts every participant at the exchange, not this network's ports, so read it as a size proxy. And an absent exchange means PCH has no record of it, not that the network is not there.

Provenance

Where this comes from

Derived from routing tables collected at 2026-08-08 10:00 UTC by route-views2,rrc00, as seen from 75 BGP vantage points across 74.02M route entries. These are observations from those vantage points, not a complete or authoritative view of the internet.

Cross-check against RIPEstat or BGP.tools, which observe from a different and larger set of vantage points.

Exchange presence comes from a separate dataset: the directory collected 2026-08-09 by Packet Clearing House (https://www.pch.net/ixp/data), covering 1,327 exchanges and 93,164 recorded member ports, licensed CC BY-NC-SA 3.0.

PeeringDB is the better-known directory and is deliberately not the source here: its acceptable-use policy forbids the bulk storage this needs. The two answer different questions anyway. PeeringDB reports what an operator declares about itself; this reports what PCH has recorded.