asn.dev

Autonomous system

AS201966 OPTIKABEL

Residential RIPE Cable/DSL/ISP

IPv4 addresses 1.79K 3 prefixes
IPv6 prefixes 2 counted as prefixes, not addresses
Countries 1 mostly PL
Exchanges 1 recorded by PCH
Upstreams 6 2 downstream
Flagged prefixes 0 none

Summary

OptiKabel Telecom

Poland · AI-generated

isp cable regional residential

OPTIKABEL is operated by OptiKabel Telecom Sp. z o.o.

What it's used for

  • The address space carries residential and business access traffic, evidenced by reverse DNS entries such as ip-91-219-119-64.optikabel.net and ip-94-229-84-128.i586.pl.
  • The AS announces 1792 IPv4 addresses and 2 IPv6 prefixes, maintaining 10 observed neighbours, a ratio consistent with a regional access provider rather than a transit carrier.
  • Traffic originates from cable and DSL subscribers in the Cieszyn region of Poland, serving local households and small businesses.

Notable

  • Registrants for the 185.92.216.0/22 and 91.219.119.0/24 prefixes align with the announcer, OptiKabel Telecom Sp. z o.o., while the 94.229.84.0/23 prefix is registered to MASTER IT Technologies, a.s.
  • The inventory includes a Czech-registered prefix (CZ-MITT-20081113) alongside Polish blocks, indicating a mixed or inherited address estate.
  • The address inventory is modest, comprising three IPv4 prefixes and two IPv6 prefixes, typical of a niche regional operator.

This description is AI-generated, best-effort context — not authoritative, and provided without any guarantee of accuracy. Source, and how to suggest an edit.

Interconnection

Peering at a glance

Full topology · Graph

Internet exchanges

Recorded at 1 exchange in 1 country, largest first.

ExchangeLocationTheir address
Thinx IXWarsaw, Poland212.91.0.55

Transit providers

6 upstream, 2 downstream and 13 adjacent networks observed; most-used upstreams first.

ASNetworkPaths seen
AS3356Level 3 Parent, LLC171
AS174Cogent Communications, LLC112
AS6939Hurricane Electric LLC81
AS62178MASTER IT Technologies, a.s.25
AS24748Atman Sp. z o.o.6
AS201054Stowarzyszenie e-Poludnie2

Exchange presence is recorded rather than inferred: the directory collected by Packet Clearing House (https://www.pch.net/ixp/data) on 2026-10-27, licensed CC BY-NC-SA 3.0. Transit is inferred from observed BGP paths, never declared by either party.

Address space

Summary

Shape and geography

IPv4 3 prefixes · 1.79K addresses IPv6 2 prefixes

CountryNamePrefixes
PLPoland5

Registry

Allocation record

RIPE · via Atlas (registry + RDAP)
Registry
RIPE
Handle
AS201966
Registry name
OPTIKABELPL
Registrant
lir-pl-optikabel-1-MNT
Abuse contact
abuse@optikabel.pl
Registered
2018-06-25
Last changed
2026-03-11
Allocation
allocated

Declared

PeeringDB profile

self-reported
Name
OptiKabel Telecom
Network type
Cable/DSL/ISP
Scope
Regional
Traffic ratio
Mostly Inbound
Peering policy
Open
IRR as-set
RIPE::AS201966:AS-OPTIKABEL
Present at
3 exchanges
Facilities
3 facilities
Website
https://www.optikabel.pl

PeeringDB records are maintained by the network operator and are not independently verified. Treat them as a statement of intent rather than of fact. For the observed and recorded view, see peering, which lists the exchanges Packet Clearing House has a port on file for.

Routing security

RPKI and IRR

Full detail
RPKI
100% valid · 8 valid, 0 with no ROA
ROAs
10 authorising AS201966
ASPA
no ASPA record
IRR
100% registered · 8 of 8 announcements
Route objects
10 naming AS201966

Reputation

Classification and threat

Residential Fixed-line consumer ISP. Addresses here are homes.

Spamhaus DROP

Not on ASN-DROP The network as a whole is not listed.

No DROP prefixes None of its announced space is on the DROP prefix list.

Spamhaus DROP ("Don't Route Or Peer") lists space and networks run by, or hijacked for, spam and cybercrime operations: 446 networks and 1,852 prefixes, as published 2026-10-27. A short, high-confidence list, so a match is worth taking seriously, and absence from it says little on its own.

FBI IC3

No IC3 indicators Nothing from the FBI IC3 feed.

IC3 threat data is alpha. Absence of an indicator is not evidence of good behaviour, only of absence from this one feed.

Elsewhere

Cross-check