asn.dev

Observed topology

AS199961 MTLS-AS

Upstreams 6 carry this network
Downstreams 11 this network carries
Adjacent (IPv4) 23
Adjacent (IPv6) 2

Transit

Upstream networks

inferred

Networks observed carrying traffic for AS199961: the AS immediately before it in a routing path. Ranked by how many paths showed the relationship, which reflects how widely it is used, not how much traffic crosses it.

ASNetworkTypeFamiliesPaths seen
AS43201Telematika LLCUnclassifiedIPv4132
AS48084Uzhnie Magistraljnie Linii Svyazi LLCUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv696
AS49673Truenetwork LLCUnclassifiedIPv43
AS208972GIBIRNET ILETISIM HIZMETLERI SANAYI VE TICARET LIMITED SIRKETIUnclassifiedIPv43
AS37721Virtual Technologies & SolutionsResidentialIPv43
AS24482SG.GSHostingIPv43

Inferred from path position, not from any declaration by either party. A network appearing here is carrying these routes; whether that is a paid transit arrangement, a backup, or something else is not something routing data can tell you.

Transit

Downstream networks

inferred

Networks for which AS199961 was observed as the last hop before the origin, meaning it appears to provide them transit.

ASNetworkTypeFamiliesPaths seen
AS197129FOP Kopilov SergeyUnclassifiedIPv4930
AS49444Lutacom LLCUnclassifiedIPv4232
AS47550Bratinov Oleg VyacheslavovichUnclassifiedIPv4200
AS50015Aleksandr ButenkoUnclassifiedIPv4150
AS215882HiperLine LTDUnclassifiedIPv463
AS201414OOO "DELTA-ELECTRONICS"UnclassifiedIPv463
AS209720LLC "Multinet-Lugan"UnclassifiedIPv444
AS213191Osipenko Alexander NikolaevichUnclassifiedIPv442
AS202619Dovecom LLCUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv629
AS43972Sergey OlenichUnclassifiedIPv422
AS207744Primak Evgenii AleksandrovichUnclassifiedIPv43

Adjacency

Adjacent networks

25 shown

Every AS seen directly next to AS199961 in a routing path, in either direction.

ASNetworkTypeFamiliesPaths seen
AS48084Uzhnie Magistraljnie Linii Svyazi LLCUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv61,149
AS197129FOP Kopilov SergeyUnclassifiedIPv4930
AS43201Telematika LLCUnclassifiedIPv4465
AS49444Lutacom LLCUnclassifiedIPv4232
AS47550Bratinov Oleg VyacheslavovichUnclassifiedIPv4200
AS6939Hurricane Electric LLCTransitIPv4177
AS50015Aleksandr ButenkoUnclassifiedIPv4150
AS215882HiperLine LTDUnclassifiedIPv463
AS201414OOO "DELTA-ELECTRONICS"UnclassifiedIPv463
AS209720LLC "Multinet-Lugan"UnclassifiedIPv444
AS50673Serverius Holding B.V.UnclassifiedIPv444
AS213191Osipenko Alexander NikolaevichUnclassifiedIPv442
AS208972GIBIRNET ILETISIM HIZMETLERI SANAYI VE TICARET LIMITED SIRKETIUnclassifiedIPv440
AS37721Virtual Technologies & SolutionsResidentialIPv438
AS49673Truenetwork LLCUnclassifiedIPv437
AS24482SG.GSHostingIPv435
AS202619Dovecom LLCUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv629
AS43972Sergey OlenichUnclassifiedIPv422
AS34927iFog GmbHHostingIPv415
AS50629LWLcom GmbHUnclassifiedIPv415
AS207744Primak Evgenii AleksandrovichUnclassifiedIPv43
AS56655Gigahost ASUnclassifiedIPv42
AS57463NetIX Communications JSCUnclassifiedIPv41

Adjacency is not the same as peering. Being next to each other in a path covers paid transit, settlement-free peering and customer connections alike, and routing data cannot distinguish them. Treat this as "these networks exchange routes", nothing more specific.

Interconnection

Exchange presence

recorded

Internet exchanges where Packet Clearing House has a port recorded for AS199961, largest fabric first. An exchange is shared switching where networks interconnect directly rather than paying a transit provider to carry traffic between them, so turning up at one is a deliberate choice about how this network wants to be reached. Each name opens that exchange's own page, with its peering LANs and every other network recorded on it. Recorded at 1 exchange across 1 country and 1 region.

ExchangeLocationTheir addressMember ports
MSK-IX MoscowMoscow, Russia195.208.211.16498

Unlike the tables above, this is recorded rather than inferred. An address on a peering LAN is at that exchange by definition. Two carve-outs all the same. Member ports counts every participant at the exchange, not this network's ports, so read it as a size proxy. And an absent exchange means PCH has no record of it, not that the network is not there.

Provenance

Where this comes from

Derived from routing tables collected at 2026-08-08 10:00 UTC by route-views2,rrc00, as seen from 75 BGP vantage points across 74.02M route entries. These are observations from those vantage points, not a complete or authoritative view of the internet.

Cross-check against RIPEstat or BGP.tools, which observe from a different and larger set of vantage points.

Exchange presence comes from a separate dataset: the directory collected 2026-08-08 by Packet Clearing House (https://www.pch.net/ixp/data), covering 1,327 exchanges and 93,137 recorded member ports, licensed CC BY-NC-SA 3.0.

PeeringDB is the better-known directory and is deliberately not the source here: its acceptable-use policy forbids the bulk storage this needs. The two answer different questions anyway. PeeringDB reports what an operator declares about itself; this reports what PCH has recorded.