asn.dev

Observed topology

AS197959 VIRTUASYS-

Upstreams 2 carry this network
Downstreams 15 this network carries
Adjacent (IPv4) 12
Adjacent (IPv6) 11

Transit

Upstream networks

inferred

Networks observed carrying traffic for AS197959: the AS immediately before it in a routing path. Ranked by how many paths showed the relationship, which reflects how widely it is used, not how much traffic crosses it.

ASNetworkTypeFamiliesPaths seen
AS6939Hurricane Electric LLCTransitIPv4 IPv6581
AS35661VIRTUA SYSTEMS SASUnclassifiedIPv62

Inferred from path position, not from any declaration by either party. A network appearing here is carrying these routes; whether that is a paid transit arrangement, a backup, or something else is not something routing data can tell you.

Transit

Downstream networks

inferred

Networks for which AS197959 was observed as the last hop before the origin, meaning it appears to provide them transit.

ASNetworkTypeFamiliesPaths seen
AS58026Xiamen Jiufu Network Co., Ltd.UnclassifiedIPv4264
AS265731Secretaria Legal y TecnicaUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv686
AS402602HyperforgeUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv677
AS399892CloudtunnelUnclassifiedIPv466
AS198077Need, L.L.C.-FZUnclassifiedIPv466
AS215686Edelskjold Holding ApSUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv659
AS401036Friendowment, LLCUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv650
AS63232EDL Manager, LLCUnclassifiedIPv448
AS402495BSHUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv646
AS219370Benjamin JohnsonUnclassifiedIPv640
AS200766Kerry Lynn brown jrUnclassifiedIPv637
AS210727Buy LimitedUnclassifiedIPv435
AS50414ThousandEyes LLCUnclassifiedIPv414
AS210961Nathan YorkUnclassifiedIPv69
AS21641VIRTUASYS-AMERICAUnclassifiedIPv61

Adjacency

Adjacent networks

23 shown

Every AS seen directly next to AS197959 in a routing path, in either direction.

ASNetworkTypeFamiliesPaths seen
AS6939Hurricane Electric LLCTransitIPv4 IPv61,478
AS58026Xiamen Jiufu Network Co., Ltd.UnclassifiedIPv4264
AS265731Secretaria Legal y TecnicaUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv686
AS402602HyperforgeUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv677
AS399892CloudtunnelUnclassifiedIPv466
AS198077Need, L.L.C.-FZUnclassifiedIPv466
AS215686Edelskjold Holding ApSUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv659
AS401036Friendowment, LLCUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv650
AS63232EDL Manager, LLCUnclassifiedIPv448
AS402495BSHUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv646
AS219370Benjamin JohnsonUnclassifiedIPv640
AS200766Kerry Lynn brown jrUnclassifiedIPv637
AS210727Buy LimitedUnclassifiedIPv435
AS50414ThousandEyes LLCUnclassifiedIPv414
AS210961Nathan YorkUnclassifiedIPv69
AS35661VIRTUA SYSTEMS SASUnclassifiedIPv63
AS21641VIRTUASYS-AMERICAUnclassifiedIPv61

Adjacency is not the same as peering. Being next to each other in a path covers paid transit, settlement-free peering and customer connections alike, and routing data cannot distinguish them. Treat this as "these networks exchange routes", nothing more specific.

Interconnection

Exchange presence

recorded

Internet exchanges where Packet Clearing House has a port recorded for AS197959, largest fabric first. An exchange is shared switching where networks interconnect directly rather than paying a transit provider to carry traffic between them, so turning up at one is a deliberate choice about how this network wants to be reached. Each name opens that exchange's own page, with its peering LANs and every other network recorded on it.

No exchange membership on file. That is not the same as peering nowhere: the dataset records what PCH has collected, and many exchanges publish no participant list at all.

Unlike the tables above, this is recorded rather than inferred. An address on a peering LAN is at that exchange by definition. Two carve-outs all the same. Member ports counts every participant at the exchange, not this network's ports, so read it as a size proxy. And an absent exchange means PCH has no record of it, not that the network is not there.

Provenance

Where this comes from

Derived from routing tables collected at 2026-08-09 10:00 UTC by route-views2,rrc00, as seen from 75 BGP vantage points across 74.03M route entries. These are observations from those vantage points, not a complete or authoritative view of the internet.

Cross-check against RIPEstat or BGP.tools, which observe from a different and larger set of vantage points.

Exchange presence comes from a separate dataset: the directory collected 2026-08-09 by Packet Clearing House (https://www.pch.net/ixp/data), covering 1,327 exchanges and 93,164 recorded member ports, licensed CC BY-NC-SA 3.0.

PeeringDB is the better-known directory and is deliberately not the source here: its acceptable-use policy forbids the bulk storage this needs. The two answer different questions anyway. PeeringDB reports what an operator declares about itself; this reports what PCH has recorded.