asn.dev

Observed topology

AS197667 FEROMEDIA-AS

Upstreams 10 carry this network
Downstreams 2 this network carries
Adjacent (IPv4) 11
Adjacent (IPv6) 5

Transit

Upstream networks

inferred

Networks observed carrying traffic for AS197667: the AS immediately before it in a routing path. Ranked by how many paths showed the relationship, which reflects how widely it is used, not how much traffic crosses it.

ASNetworkTypeFamiliesPaths seen
AS62081Stowarzyszenie e-PoludnieUnclassifiedIPv4132
AS6939Hurricane Electric LLCTransitIPv4 IPv688
AS5617Orange Polska Spolka AkcyjnaMobileIPv4 IPv652
AS3257GTT Communications Inc.TransitIPv424
AS24482SG.GSHostingIPv4 IPv69
AS3303Swisscom (Schweiz) AGResidentialIPv4 IPv68
AS50607Stowarzyszenie e-PoludnieUnclassifiedIPv46
AS24115EquinixHostingIPv44
AS20485Joint Stock Company TransTeleComUnclassifiedIPv44
AS201054Stowarzyszenie e-PoludnieUnclassifiedIPv62

Inferred from path position, not from any declaration by either party. A network appearing here is carrying these routes; whether that is a paid transit arrangement, a backup, or something else is not something routing data can tell you.

Transit

Downstream networks

inferred

Networks for which AS197667 was observed as the last hop before the origin, meaning it appears to provide them transit.

ASNetworkTypeFamiliesPaths seen
AS197701NET-KOMP Krystian KaniaUnclassifiedIPv4105
AS198393VIRTUAL TELECOM SP. Z O.O.UnclassifiedIPv460

Adjacency

Adjacent networks

16 shown

Every AS seen directly next to AS197667 in a routing path, in either direction.

ASNetworkTypeFamiliesPaths seen
AS62081Stowarzyszenie e-PoludnieUnclassifiedIPv4228
AS197701NET-KOMP Krystian KaniaUnclassifiedIPv4105
AS5617Orange Polska Spolka AkcyjnaMobileIPv4 IPv6102
AS6939Hurricane Electric LLCTransitIPv4 IPv698
AS198393VIRTUAL TELECOM SP. Z O.O.UnclassifiedIPv460
AS3257GTT Communications Inc.TransitIPv430
AS3303Swisscom (Schweiz) AGResidentialIPv4 IPv610
AS24482SG.GSHostingIPv4 IPv610
AS50607Stowarzyszenie e-PoludnieUnclassifiedIPv46
AS24115EquinixHostingIPv44
AS20485Joint Stock Company TransTeleComUnclassifiedIPv44
AS201054Stowarzyszenie e-PoludnieUnclassifiedIPv62

Adjacency is not the same as peering. Being next to each other in a path covers paid transit, settlement-free peering and customer connections alike, and routing data cannot distinguish them. Treat this as "these networks exchange routes", nothing more specific.

Interconnection

Exchange presence

recorded

Internet exchanges where Packet Clearing House has a port recorded for AS197667, largest fabric first. An exchange is shared switching where networks interconnect directly rather than paying a transit provider to carry traffic between them, so turning up at one is a deliberate choice about how this network wants to be reached. Each name opens that exchange's own page, with its peering LANs and every other network recorded on it. Recorded at 2 exchanges across 1 country and 1 region.

ExchangeLocationTheir addressMember ports
TPIX - Internet ExchangeWarsaw, Poland195.149.232.117462
Equinix Internet Exchange WarsawWarsaw, Poland195.182.219.9300

Unlike the tables above, this is recorded rather than inferred. An address on a peering LAN is at that exchange by definition. Two carve-outs all the same. Member ports counts every participant at the exchange, not this network's ports, so read it as a size proxy. And an absent exchange means PCH has no record of it, not that the network is not there.

Provenance

Where this comes from

Derived from routing tables collected at 2026-08-08 10:00 UTC by route-views2,rrc00, as seen from 75 BGP vantage points across 74.02M route entries. These are observations from those vantage points, not a complete or authoritative view of the internet.

Cross-check against RIPEstat or BGP.tools, which observe from a different and larger set of vantage points.

Exchange presence comes from a separate dataset: the directory collected 2026-08-09 by Packet Clearing House (https://www.pch.net/ixp/data), covering 1,327 exchanges and 93,164 recorded member ports, licensed CC BY-NC-SA 3.0.

PeeringDB is the better-known directory and is deliberately not the source here: its acceptable-use policy forbids the bulk storage this needs. The two answer different questions anyway. PeeringDB reports what an operator declares about itself; this reports what PCH has recorded.