asn.dev

Autonomous system

AS16746 RELIANTENERGY

Unclassified ARIN

IPv4 addresses 9.73K 14 prefixes
IPv6 prefixes 0 counted as prefixes, not addresses
Countries 1 mostly US
Exchanges 0 recorded by PCH
Upstreams 5 0 downstream
Flagged prefixes 0 none

Summary

CenterPoint Energy, Inc.

United States of America · AI-generated

enterprise infrastructure business

The netname, the handle and the holder are three company names in reverse chronological order.

What it's used for

  • A utility's network. Eighteen IPv4 prefixes announced from the United States, no sixth-version space, nine thousand seven hundred and twenty-eight addresses, through five observed BGP neighbours.

Notable

  • Every block carries one netname: three initials, a city, and a counter reading one.
  • Those three initials belong to a company name older than anything else in the record.
  • The AS handle is a different name again, two words run together, one the utility used between the initials and the name it has now.
  • The holder line and every registrant give the current name.
  • All eighteen blocks come from a single parent range, at four sizes, and eighteen addresses were queried for reverse DNS with none returning a name.

Interesting

  • Three fields, three names, oldest label first. The netname was set when the space was granted and has never been touched; the handle was set at a later rename and then frozen in turn; only the registrant is maintained. Reading the record top to bottom walks backwards through the company's history.
  • Eighteen prefixes carved from one range under one label is a network that has been subdivided many times for internal reasons and never re-registered. The registry sees one thing; the routing table sees eighteen.
  • A city in the netname on a utility's space marks where the operation started, which for an electricity company is also where the wires are.

This description is AI-generated, best-effort context — not authoritative, and provided without any guarantee of accuracy. Source, and how to suggest an edit.

Interconnection

Peering at a glance

Full topology · Graph

Internet exchanges

No exchange port on file. Many exchanges publish no participant list, so this is not proof of absence.

Transit providers

5 upstream, 0 downstream and 5 adjacent networks observed; most-used upstreams first.

ASNetworkPaths seen
AS701Verizon Business734
AS209CenturyLink Communications, LLC221
AS7018AT&T Enterprises, LLC220
AS15830Equinix (EMEA) Acquisition Enterprises B.V.113
AS33662Comcast Cable Communications, LLC69

Exchange presence is recorded rather than inferred: the directory collected by Packet Clearing House (https://www.pch.net/ixp/data) on 2026-10-26, licensed CC BY-NC-SA 3.0. Transit is inferred from observed BGP paths, never declared by either party.

Address space

Summary

Shape and geography

IPv4 14 prefixes · 9.73K addresses IPv6 0 prefixes

CountryNamePrefixes
USUnited States of America14

Registry

Allocation record

ARIN · via Atlas (registry + RDAP)
Registry
ARIN
Handle
AS16746
Registry name
RELIANTENERGY
Registrant
CenterPoint Energy, Inc.
Abuse contact
it-networkservices@centerpointenergy.com
Registered
2000-06-05
Last changed
2023-07-19
Allocation
assigned

Routing security

RPKI and IRR

Full detail
RPKI
0% valid · 0 valid, 23 with no ROA
ROAs
0 authorising AS16746
ASPA
no ASPA record
IRR
100% registered · 23 of 23 announcements
Route objects
2 naming AS16746

Reputation

Classification and threat

Unclassified Not in the curated lists. Most of the ~80,000 allocated ASNs are not.

Spamhaus DROP

Not on ASN-DROP The network as a whole is not listed.

No DROP prefixes None of its announced space is on the DROP prefix list.

Spamhaus DROP ("Don't Route Or Peer") lists space and networks run by, or hijacked for, spam and cybercrime operations: 446 networks and 1,852 prefixes, as published 2026-10-27. A short, high-confidence list, so a match is worth taking seriously, and absence from it says little on its own.

FBI IC3

No IC3 indicators Nothing from the FBI IC3 feed.

IC3 threat data is alpha. Absence of an indicator is not evidence of good behaviour, only of absence from this one feed.

Elsewhere

Cross-check