asn.dev

Autonomous system

AS16596 Universidad Autonoma del Estado de Baja California

Unclassified ARIN

IPv4 addresses 62.21K 22 prefixes
IPv6 prefixes 1 counted as prefixes, not addresses
Countries 1 mostly MX
Exchanges 0 recorded by PCH
Upstreams 2 0 downstream
Flagged prefixes 0 none

Summary

Universidad Autonoma del Estado de Baja California

Mexico · AI-generated

education research infrastructure

Ten announcements, one netname, and it is the whole parent range written out as two addresses.

What it's used for

  • A university's network. Ten IPv4 prefixes and one IPv6 prefix announced from Mexico, sixty-five thousand five hundred and thirty-six addresses, through two observed BGP neighbours.

Notable

  • The AS handle is the university's full name, seven words with spaces, in a field that normally holds one token.
  • Every block carries the same netname, and it is not a name: it is the first and last address of the entire parent range, with spaces around a hyphen. Ten blocks, one label, none of it specific to any of them.
  • The blocks are that parent range cut into six different sizes and announced piece by piece.
  • Ten of eighteen queried addresses answered, each built the same way: the university's initials, the last two parts of the address, then a three-letter site code, then the university's own domain.
  • Three different site codes appear across the answers, so the naming distinguishes campuses where the registry distinguishes nothing.

Interesting

  • The reverse zone carries what the registry lacks. One field says which of three sites an address is at; the registry says only that the university has a range.
  • A range this size is an early allocation. Universities were among the first to ask, and they were given space on a scale nobody would grant now.
  • Cutting one range into ten announcements is internal routing made visible. Every one of those pieces is carried worldwide so that traffic can be steered between campuses locally.

This description is AI-generated, best-effort context — not authoritative, and provided without any guarantee of accuracy. Source, and how to suggest an edit.

Interconnection

Peering at a glance

Full topology · Graph

Internet exchanges

No exchange port on file. Many exchanges publish no participant list, so this is not proof of absence.

Transit providers

2 upstream, 0 downstream and 3 adjacent networks observed; most-used upstreams first.

ASNetworkPaths seen
AS17072TOTAL PLAY TELECOMUNICACIONES, S.A.P.I. DE C.V.3,057
AS22884TOTAL PLAY TELECOMUNICACIONES, S.A.P.I. DE C.V.347

Exchange presence is recorded rather than inferred: the directory collected by Packet Clearing House (https://www.pch.net/ixp/data) on 2026-10-11, licensed CC BY-NC-SA 3.0. Transit is inferred from observed BGP paths, never declared by either party.

Address space

Summary

Shape and geography

IPv4 22 prefixes · 62.21K addresses IPv6 1 prefixes

CountryNamePrefixes
MXMexico23

Registry

Allocation record

ARIN · via Atlas (registry + RDAP)
Registry
ARIN
Handle
AS16596
Registry name
16596
Registrant
Universidad Autonoma del Estado de Baja California
Abuse contact
dtr@uabc.edu.mx
Registered
2000-05-23
Last changed
2016-07-20
Allocation
allocated

Routing security

RPKI and IRR

Full detail
RPKI
0% valid · 0 valid, 59 with no ROA
ROAs
0 authorising AS16596
ASPA
no ASPA record
IRR
100% registered · 59 of 59 announcements
Route objects
61 naming AS16596

Reputation

Classification and threat

Unclassified Not in the curated lists. Most of the ~80,000 allocated ASNs are not.

Spamhaus DROP

Not on ASN-DROP The network as a whole is not listed.

No DROP prefixes None of its announced space is on the DROP prefix list.

Spamhaus DROP ("Don't Route Or Peer") lists space and networks run by, or hijacked for, spam and cybercrime operations: 431 networks and 1,768 prefixes, as published 2026-10-12. A short, high-confidence list, so a match is worth taking seriously, and absence from it says little on its own.

FBI IC3

No IC3 indicators Nothing from the FBI IC3 feed.

IC3 threat data is alpha. Absence of an indicator is not evidence of good behaviour, only of absence from this one feed.

Elsewhere

Cross-check