asn.dev

Autonomous system

AS16399 FIRSTCOMM-AS2

Unclassified ARIN

IPv4 addresses 127K 39 prefixes
IPv6 prefixes 3 counted as prefixes, not addresses
Countries 1 mostly US
Exchanges 0 recorded by PCH
Upstreams 5 2 downstream
Flagged prefixes 0 none

Summary

First Communications

United States of America · AI-generated

isp telecom transit

The netnames are numbered two, four, six, seven, eight and nine, and the number two is used three times.

What it's used for

  • A provider's network. Thirty-six prefixes announced from the United States, three of them IPv6, one hundred and twenty-seven thousand two hundred and thirty-two addresses, through seven observed BGP neighbours.

Notable

  • Most netnames are the company's short name, the word for a network, and a numeral. The numerals skip values, and the lowest one appears on three separate blocks.
  • Four more blocks carry a five-letter name from an acquired provider, with no numeral and no date.
  • The numbered blocks list three contacts each: the company, a systems administration team, and an abuse contact under the company's initials. The acquired blocks list the company alone.
  • Nine of eighteen queried addresses answered, across four domains in three styles. Some write the address hyphenated with a label naming the protocol version. Some write it hyphenated with the word for a static assignment. Two write it backwards, one with a label for a business line and one for a leased line.
  • One answer is a customer's own domain with a single number after the word for a host.

Interesting

  • Numbering your networks only works if you keep the list. Gaps and repeats mean the numbering outlived whoever was tracking it, which is what happens when a provider grows by acquisition.
  • Four reverse-name conventions on one network is four acquisitions' worth of DNS that was never consolidated. Each one still resolves, which is the only test that ever mattered.

This description is AI-generated, best-effort context — not authoritative, and provided without any guarantee of accuracy. Source, and how to suggest an edit.

Interconnection

Peering at a glance

Full topology · Graph

Internet exchanges

No exchange port on file. Many exchanges publish no participant list, so this is not proof of absence.

Transit providers

5 upstream, 2 downstream and 11 adjacent networks observed; most-used upstreams first.

ASNetworkPaths seen
AS6461Zayo Bandwidth543
AS40264Charter Communications LLC368
AS174Cogent Communications, LLC280
AS3356Level 3 Parent, LLC242
AS20473The Constant Company, LLC59

Exchange presence is recorded rather than inferred: the directory collected by Packet Clearing House (https://www.pch.net/ixp/data) on 2026-10-26, licensed CC BY-NC-SA 3.0. Transit is inferred from observed BGP paths, never declared by either party.

Address space

Summary

Shape and geography

IPv4 39 prefixes · 127K addresses IPv6 3 prefixes

CountryNamePrefixes
USUnited States of America42

Registry

Allocation record

ARIN · via Atlas (registry + RDAP)
Registry
ARIN
Handle
AS16399
Registry name
FIRSTCOMM-AS2
Registrant
First Communications LLC
Abuse contact
netopssa@firstcomm.com
Registered
2000-04-25
Last changed
2012-03-02
Allocation
assigned

Routing security

RPKI and IRR

Full detail
RPKI
11% valid · 3 valid, 25 with no ROA
ROAs
3 authorising AS16399
ASPA
no ASPA record
IRR
100% registered · 28 of 28 announcements
Route objects
31 naming AS16399

Reputation

Classification and threat

Unclassified Not in the curated lists. Most of the ~80,000 allocated ASNs are not.

Spamhaus DROP

Not on ASN-DROP The network as a whole is not listed.

No DROP prefixes None of its announced space is on the DROP prefix list.

Spamhaus DROP ("Don't Route Or Peer") lists space and networks run by, or hijacked for, spam and cybercrime operations: 446 networks and 1,852 prefixes, as published 2026-10-27. A short, high-confidence list, so a match is worth taking seriously, and absence from it says little on its own.

FBI IC3

No IC3 indicators Nothing from the FBI IC3 feed.

IC3 threat data is alpha. Absence of an indicator is not evidence of good behaviour, only of absence from this one feed.

Elsewhere

Cross-check