asn.dev

Autonomous system

AS16285 ASN-UMN Technicheskaya Str.18b, Yekaterinburg, Russia

Unclassified RIPE

IPv4 addresses 44.03K 28 prefixes
IPv6 prefixes 27 counted as prefixes, not addresses
Countries 1 mostly RU
Exchanges 0 recorded by PCH
Upstreams 2 1 downstream
Flagged prefixes 0 none

Summary

TransTeleCom

Russian Federation · AI-generated

telecom isp transit

One address answers reverse DNS with the reverse-lookup name itself, pointing at nothing but the question.

What it's used for

  • A carrier's regional network. Fifty-five prefixes announced from the Russian Federation, twenty-seven of them IPv6, forty-four thousand and thirty-two addresses, through three observed BGP neighbours.

Notable

  • The AS handle is three initials and then a street name, a house number with a letter suffix, a city and a country. The routing label is a postal address, and the initials match nothing in the holder field.
  • Every sampled block uses one scheme: a country code, the carrier's brand, and a full date, with dates spanning eleven years.
  • All of them list the same two contacts, an operations centre abbreviated to three letters and the company under its full legal form.
  • Two of eighteen queried addresses answered. One returns the special-purpose name that reverse lookups are asked under, with the address written backwards, so the answer is a restatement of the query.
  • The other pairs a two-letter protocol abbreviation and the last octet with a town's name as the domain.
  • Twenty-seven IPv6 prefixes against twenty-eight IPv4 blocks is close to parity between the protocols.

Interesting

  • A reverse record answering with the reverse-lookup name is what a misconfigured zone produces: the server has been told to point the name at itself. It resolves, it means nothing, and nothing checks it.
  • Initials in a handle that match no company are the previous operator. Regional carriers get absorbed and the label stays, because changing it needs a reason and keeping it needs none.

This description is AI-generated, best-effort context — not authoritative, and provided without any guarantee of accuracy. Source, and how to suggest an edit.

Interconnection

Peering at a glance

Full topology · Graph

Internet exchanges

No exchange port on file. Many exchanges publish no participant list, so this is not proof of absence.

Transit providers

2 upstream, 1 downstream and 5 adjacent networks observed; most-used upstreams first.

ASNetworkPaths seen
AS15774Limited Liability Company "TTK-Svyaz"2,217
AS20485Joint Stock Company TransTeleCom1,216

Exchange presence is recorded rather than inferred: the directory collected by Packet Clearing House (https://www.pch.net/ixp/data) on 2026-10-11, licensed CC BY-NC-SA 3.0. Transit is inferred from observed BGP paths, never declared by either party.

Address space

Summary

Shape and geography

IPv4 28 prefixes · 44.03K addresses IPv6 27 prefixes

CountryNamePrefixes
RURussian Federation55

Registry

Allocation record

RIPE · via Atlas (registry + RDAP)
Registry
RIPE
Handle
AS16285
Registry name
ASN-UMN
Registrant
Joint Stock Company TransTeleCom
Abuse contact
abuse@ttk.ru
Registered
2002-07-29
Last changed
2025-01-13
Allocation
allocated

Routing security

RPKI and IRR

Full detail
RPKI
0% valid · 0 valid, 62 with no ROA
ROAs
0 authorising AS16285
ASPA
no ASPA record
IRR
100% registered · 62 of 62 announcements
Route objects
82 naming AS16285

Reputation

Classification and threat

Unclassified Not in the curated lists. Most of the ~80,000 allocated ASNs are not.

Spamhaus DROP

Not on ASN-DROP The network as a whole is not listed.

No DROP prefixes None of its announced space is on the DROP prefix list.

Spamhaus DROP ("Don't Route Or Peer") lists space and networks run by, or hijacked for, spam and cybercrime operations: 431 networks and 1,768 prefixes, as published 2026-10-12. A short, high-confidence list, so a match is worth taking seriously, and absence from it says little on its own.

FBI IC3

No IC3 indicators Nothing from the FBI IC3 feed.

IC3 threat data is alpha. Absence of an indicator is not evidence of good behaviour, only of absence from this one feed.

Elsewhere

Cross-check