asn.dev

Autonomous system

AS15874 INTERKAM

Unclassified RIPE Cable/DSL/ISP

IPv4 addresses 12.54K 19 prefixes
IPv6 prefixes 1 counted as prefixes, not addresses
Countries 1 mostly PL
Exchanges 0 recorded by PCH
Upstreams 3 0 downstream
Flagged prefixes 0 none

Summary

INTERKAM

Poland · AI-generated

isp telecom business

One router's reverse name sits on a domain spelled one letter away from every other name in the network.

What it's used for

  • A regional provider's network. Twelve IPv4 prefixes and one IPv6 /29 announced from Poland, fourteen thousand eight hundred and forty-eight addresses, across six observed BGP neighbours.

Notable

  • Seven of eighteen queried addresses answered. Six of those names are the word for a host with the last octet attached, then the letter for a virtual network with the third octet, then the company's domain.
  • The seventh is a router, on a different block, and its domain differs from the company's by one letter in the last position before the country code.
  • Netnames sort the estate by purpose rather than by date: one for the core, several for customers, one for customers at a named town, and three carrying a country code with a contracted brand and 20120220.
  • The IPv6 allocation is a /29, which is the size a provider receives to hand out, not one address range.

Interesting

  • A /29 in IPv6 is larger than every IPv4 address that has ever existed, many times over, held by a provider announcing under fifteen thousand IPv4 addresses. That asymmetry is the whole point of the newer protocol and it looks absurd in an inventory.
  • Naming customer blocks after a town while the rest are generic tells you where a second network was absorbed, and the odd router domain sits on exactly that block.

This description is AI-generated, best-effort context — not authoritative, and provided without any guarantee of accuracy. Source, and how to suggest an edit.

Interconnection

Peering at a glance

Full topology · Graph

Internet exchanges

No exchange port on file. Many exchanges publish no participant list, so this is not proof of absence.

Transit providers

3 upstream, 0 downstream and 3 adjacent networks observed; most-used upstreams first.

ASNetworkPaths seen
AS29535Orange Polska Spolka Akcyjna315
AS24482SG.GS6
AS5617Orange Polska Spolka Akcyjna5

Exchange presence is recorded rather than inferred: the directory collected by Packet Clearing House (https://www.pch.net/ixp/data) on 2026-10-13, licensed CC BY-NC-SA 3.0. Transit is inferred from observed BGP paths, never declared by either party.

Address space

Summary

Shape and geography

IPv4 19 prefixes · 12.54K addresses IPv6 1 prefixes

CountryNamePrefixes
PLPoland20

Registry

Allocation record

RIPE · via Atlas (registry + RDAP)
Registry
RIPE
Handle
AS15874
Registry name
INTERKAM
Registrant
MNT-INTERKAM
Abuse contact
ip@interkam.net
Registered
2012-03-12
Last changed
2025-02-26
Allocation
allocated

Declared

PeeringDB profile

self-reported
Name
Interkam
Network type
Cable/DSL/ISP
Scope
Regional
Traffic ratio
Not Disclosed
Peering policy
Open
Present at
1 exchanges
Website
http://www.interkam.pl

PeeringDB records are maintained by the network operator and are not independently verified. Treat them as a statement of intent rather than of fact. For the observed and recorded view, see peering, which lists the exchanges Packet Clearing House has a port on file for.

Routing security

RPKI and IRR

Full detail
RPKI
100% valid · 6 valid, 0 with no ROA
ROAs
10 authorising AS15874
ASPA
no ASPA record
IRR
100% registered · 6 of 6 announcements
Route objects
9 naming AS15874

Reputation

Classification and threat

Unclassified Not in the curated lists. Most of the ~80,000 allocated ASNs are not.

Spamhaus DROP

Not on ASN-DROP The network as a whole is not listed.

No DROP prefixes None of its announced space is on the DROP prefix list.

Spamhaus DROP ("Don't Route Or Peer") lists space and networks run by, or hijacked for, spam and cybercrime operations: 436 networks and 1,771 prefixes, as published 2026-10-13. A short, high-confidence list, so a match is worth taking seriously, and absence from it says little on its own.

FBI IC3

No IC3 indicators Nothing from the FBI IC3 feed.

IC3 threat data is alpha. Absence of an indicator is not evidence of good behaviour, only of absence from this one feed.

Elsewhere

Cross-check