Autonomous system
AS15723 AZERONLINE
Unclassified RIPE Cable/DSL/ISP
Summary
AzerOnline
isp telecom business
The reverse names publish VLAN numbers, and one netname names a block it is not on.
What it's used for
- A national provider. Twenty-two IPv4 prefixes announced from Azerbaijan, no IPv6, fifteen thousand addresses, through a single observed BGP neighbour.
Notable
- Five of the six answering names are the word for a virtual LAN, a number and the last octet, and that number is the address's own third octet, so the internal segment identifier is published with every address.
- The sixth names a point of presence and the city it sits in:
pop-ganja-254.azeronline.com. - The twenty-two blocks use six netname conventions: a bare brand, the brand with a network suffix, that suffix with a serial number, that suffix with the block's own octets, and a country code with a date in two variants.
- One of the octet-bearing netnames does not match its block. The block's second octet is missing from the name and a different number stands in its place.
- Only the dated blocks name the company. The rest list an administrative object and an abuse contact called an email box.
- Eighteen addresses were queried and six returned a name.
Interesting
- Fifteen thousand addresses behind one upstream is the whole network depending on one path. For a provider of this size that is the single most consequential fact in the record.
- Publishing VLAN numbers hands a reader the internal segmentation for free. Nothing is exposed by it directly and it removes the guesswork from mapping the network.
This description is AI-generated, best-effort context — not authoritative, and provided without any guarantee of accuracy. Source, and how to suggest an edit.
Interconnection
Peering at a glance
Internet exchanges
No exchange port on file. Many exchanges publish no participant list, so this is not proof of absence.
Transit providers
1 upstream, 0 downstream and 1 adjacent networks observed; most-used upstreams first.
| AS | Network | Paths seen |
|---|---|---|
| AS34170 | Aztelekom LLC | 3,511 |
Exchange presence is recorded rather than inferred: the directory collected by Packet Clearing House (https://www.pch.net/ixp/data) on 2026-10-14, licensed CC BY-NC-SA 3.0. Transit is inferred from observed BGP paths, never declared by either party.
Address space
Summary
IPv4 22 prefixes · 15.10K addresses IPv6 0 prefixes
| Country | Name | Prefixes |
|---|---|---|
| AZ | Azerbaijan | 22 |
Registry
Allocation record
- Registry
- RIPE
- Handle
AS15723- Registry name
- AZERONLINE-AS
- Registrant
- AZERONLINE-MNT
- Abuse contact
- abuse@azeronline.com
- Registered
- 2002-08-28
- Last changed
- 2026-07-27
- Allocation
- allocated
Declared
PeeringDB profile
- Name
- AZERONLINE
- Also known as
- AZOL
- Network type
- Cable/DSL/ISP
- Scope
- Regional
- Traffic ratio
- Balanced
- Peering policy
- Open
- IRR as-set
AS-AZERONLINE- Website
- https://azeronline.com
PeeringDB records are maintained by the network operator and are not independently verified. Treat them as a statement of intent rather than of fact. For the observed and recorded view, see peering, which lists the exchanges Packet Clearing House has a port on file for.
Routing security
RPKI and IRR
- RPKI
- 100% valid · 59 valid, 0 with no ROA
- ROAs
- 61 authorising AS15723
- ASPA
- no ASPA record
- IRR
- 100% registered · 59 of 59 announcements
- Route objects
- 63 naming AS15723
Reputation
Classification and threat
Unclassified Not in the curated lists. Most of the ~80,000 allocated ASNs are not.
Spamhaus DROP
Not on ASN-DROP The network as a whole is not listed.
No DROP prefixes None of its announced space is on the DROP prefix list.
Spamhaus DROP ("Don't Route Or Peer") lists space and networks run by, or hijacked for, spam and cybercrime operations: 442 networks and 1,773 prefixes, as published 2026-10-13. A short, high-confidence list, so a match is worth taking seriously, and absence from it says little on its own.
FBI IC3
No IC3 indicators Nothing from the FBI IC3 feed.
IC3 threat data is alpha. Absence of an indicator is not evidence of good behaviour, only of absence from this one feed.
Elsewhere