asn.dev

Autonomous system

AS15493 RUSCOMP-AS Russian company LLC. Internet Service Provider, Tyumen

Unclassified RIPE

IPv4 addresses 15.87K 22 prefixes
IPv6 prefixes 3 counted as prefixes, not addresses
Countries 1 mostly RU
Exchanges 1 recorded by PCH
Upstreams 8 10 downstream
Flagged prefixes 0 none

Summary

Russian company LLC

Russian Federation · AI-generated

isp telecom infrastructure

The registered trade name is the phrase "Russian company", in quotation marks.

What it's used for

  • A regional internet provider. Twenty-four IPv4 prefixes and three IPv6 /48 prefixes announced from the Russian Federation, fifteen thousand addresses, across twenty-seven observed BGP neighbours.

Notable

  • The holder's name is a generic two-word phrase in quotation marks followed by a corporate form, so the registry entry reads as a placeholder rather than a brand.
  • The AS handle continues into a whole sentence naming the business type and the city it serves.
  • Netnames carry allocation dates spread across a decade, one block roughly every year and a half.
  • Three blocks share a different netname whose registrant is only an abuse role, with no company named at all.
  • Eighteen addresses were queried for reverse DNS and none returned a name.

Interesting

  • Twenty-four routes for fifteen thousand addresses is heavy fragmentation, and the netname dates explain it: this network grew by accumulating small allocations rather than by receiving one large one.
  • Twenty-seven neighbours is a lot for a network this size, and it is how regional providers in a competitive market stay reachable without paying for large transit.
  • Three small IPv6 prefixes against twenty-four IPv4 routes is the proportion that dates the deployment. The address space exists and the network has not been rebuilt around it.

This description is AI-generated, best-effort context — not authoritative, and provided without any guarantee of accuracy. Source, and how to suggest an edit.

Interconnection

Peering at a glance

Full topology · Graph

Internet exchanges

Recorded at 1 exchange in 1 country, largest first.

ExchangeLocationTheir address
MSK-IX EkaterinburgEkaterinburg, Russia194.85.107.84

Transit providers

8 upstream, 10 downstream and 22 adjacent networks observed; most-used upstreams first.

ASNetworkPaths seen
AS3216PJSC "Vimpelcom"2,363
AS31133PJSC MegaFon969
AS12389PJSC Rostelecom371
AS50923Metroset Ltd.48
AS9049JSC "ER-Telecom Holding"18
AS37721Virtual Technologies & Solutions9
AS51028Zummer LLC9
AS208972GIBIRNET ILETISIM HIZMETLERI SANAYI VE TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI9

Exchange presence is recorded rather than inferred: the directory collected by Packet Clearing House (https://www.pch.net/ixp/data) on 2026-10-13, licensed CC BY-NC-SA 3.0. Transit is inferred from observed BGP paths, never declared by either party.

Address space

Summary

Shape and geography

IPv4 22 prefixes · 15.87K addresses IPv6 3 prefixes

CountryNamePrefixes
RURussian Federation25

Registry

Allocation record

RIPE · via Atlas (registry + RDAP)
Registry
RIPE
Handle
AS15493
Registry name
RUSCOMP-AS
Registrant
"Russian company" LLC
Abuse contact
lir@t72.ru
Registered
2002-03-21
Last changed
2026-08-30
Allocation
allocated

Routing security

RPKI and IRR

Full detail
RPKI
100% valid · 65 valid, 0 with no ROA
ROAs
76 authorising AS15493
ASPA
no ASPA record
IRR
100% registered · 65 of 65 announcements
Route objects
109 naming AS15493

Reputation

Classification and threat

Unclassified Not in the curated lists. Most of the ~80,000 allocated ASNs are not.

Spamhaus DROP

Not on ASN-DROP The network as a whole is not listed.

No DROP prefixes None of its announced space is on the DROP prefix list.

Spamhaus DROP ("Don't Route Or Peer") lists space and networks run by, or hijacked for, spam and cybercrime operations: 436 networks and 1,771 prefixes, as published 2026-10-13. A short, high-confidence list, so a match is worth taking seriously, and absence from it says little on its own.

FBI IC3

No IC3 indicators Nothing from the FBI IC3 feed.

IC3 threat data is alpha. Absence of an indicator is not evidence of good behaviour, only of absence from this one feed.

Elsewhere

Cross-check