asn.dev

Autonomous system

AS15399 WANANCHI-

Residential AFRINIC

IPv4 addresses 228K 165 prefixes
IPv6 prefixes 18 counted as prefixes, not addresses
Countries 1 mostly KE
Exchanges 2 recorded by PCH
Upstreams 6 5 downstream
Flagged prefixes 0 none

Summary

Wananchi Group (Kenya)

Kenya · AI-generated

isp telecom infrastructure

Nine IPv6 announcements that double in size step by step and tile one range exactly.

What it's used for

  • A large consumer and business internet provider. One hundred and fifty-seven IPv4 prefixes and eighteen IPv6 prefixes announced from Kenya, two hundred and twenty-six thousand addresses, across fourteen observed BGP neighbours.

Notable

  • The IPv6 announcements form a staircase: two /48 prefixes, then a /47, a /46, a /45, a /43, a /42 and a /41, each covering twice the space of the last, plus a /44 below them. Together they tile one contiguous range exactly.
  • The holder's name is stored twice on one line, separated by a dash, the same words repeated.
  • The AS handle is the company name followed by a hyphen and nothing after it.
  • Almost every netname is the registry's own organisation identifier rather than a name; one block's is recorded as unknown.
  • Three answering addresses put the full address in front of the company domain, unreversed, so the name reads as the number it points at.

Interesting

  • That staircase is what an allocation looks like when it is announced piece by piece as each part is brought into service, and the pieces were never merged afterwards.
  • Fourteen neighbours for a network this large is few. It suggests most traffic leaves through a small number of upstreams, which is the usual constraint where undersea capacity is expensive.
  • One hundred and fifty-seven IPv4 routes from one operator is a heavy load on every router on the internet, and most of it could be carried by far fewer announcements.

This description is AI-generated, best-effort context — not authoritative, and provided without any guarantee of accuracy. Source, and how to suggest an edit.

Interconnection

Peering at a glance

Full topology · Graph

Internet exchanges

Recorded at 2 exchanges in 2 countries, largest first.

ExchangeLocationTheir address
LINX LON1London, United Kingdom195.66.225.89
Kenya Internet Exchange Point - NairobiNairobi, Kenya196.223.21.10

Transit providers

6 upstream, 5 downstream and 21 adjacent networks observed; most-used upstreams first.

ASNetworkPaths seen
AS37662West Indian Ocean Cable Company32,727
AS37271Workonline Communications(Pty) Ltd16,702
AS37084Simbanet (T) Limited1,603
AS30844Liquid Telecommunications Ltd877
AS328977Wavex Internet Service Provider LTD756
AS37027Simbanet (T) Limited672

Exchange presence is recorded rather than inferred: the directory collected by Packet Clearing House (https://www.pch.net/ixp/data) on 2026-10-10, licensed CC BY-NC-SA 3.0. Transit is inferred from observed BGP paths, never declared by either party.

Address space

Summary

Shape and geography

IPv4 165 prefixes · 228K addresses IPv6 18 prefixes

CountryNamePrefixes
KEKenya183

Registry

Allocation record

AFRINIC · via Atlas (registry data)
Registry
AFRINIC
Registered
2007-09-19
Allocation
allocated

Routing security

RPKI and IRR

Full detail
RPKI
90% valid · 732 valid, 84 with no ROA
ROAs
86 authorising AS15399
ASPA
no ASPA record
IRR
99.5% registered · 812 of 816 announcements 4 other origin
Route objects
2,215 naming AS15399

Reputation

Classification and threat

Residential Fixed-line consumer ISP. Addresses here are homes.

Spamhaus DROP

Not on ASN-DROP The network as a whole is not listed.

No DROP prefixes None of its announced space is on the DROP prefix list.

Spamhaus DROP ("Don't Route Or Peer") lists space and networks run by, or hijacked for, spam and cybercrime operations: 431 networks and 1,775 prefixes, as published 2026-10-11. A short, high-confidence list, so a match is worth taking seriously, and absence from it says little on its own.

FBI IC3

No IC3 indicators Nothing from the FBI IC3 feed.

IC3 threat data is alpha. Absence of an indicator is not evidence of good behaviour, only of absence from this one feed.

Elsewhere

Cross-check