Autonomous system
AS15311 TELEFONICA EMPRESAS CHILE SA
Unclassified APNIC
Summary
Telefónica Empresas Chile
isp telecom business infrastructure
Eighty-seven prefixes, one hundred and nineteen thousand addresses, and one observed neighbour.
What it's used for
- A national carrier's business services network. Eighty-seven IPv4 prefixes announced from Chile, no IPv6, across a single observed BGP neighbour.
Notable
- Every netname is an address range written as two addresses separated by spaces, a registry convention rather than a name, so no block carries a label a person chose.
- Several of those ranges are far larger than the routes announced from them, so one registry record covers many separate announcements.
- The registrant appears in at least three forms, one with an accent, one naming the wholesale division in brackets, and one under a predecessor company with a stray full stop in its name.
- Five of eighteen sampled addresses answered, all in the same form: the address with dashes, the word static, and a three letter domain.
- One block's registry lookup failed, so nothing can be said about who holds it.
Interesting
- One observed neighbour for a network this size means the measurement sees it through a single path. A carrier with a hundred thousand addresses has more connections than that; what shows here is the vantage point, not the topology.
- Naming every address as static is useful to the carrier's own support and useful to anyone building a list of fixed business connections. It marks these as endpoints that will still be there tomorrow.
This description is AI-generated, best-effort context — not authoritative, and provided without any guarantee of accuracy. Source, and how to suggest an edit.
Interconnection
Peering at a glance
Internet exchanges
No exchange port on file. Many exchanges publish no participant list, so this is not proof of absence.
Transit providers
1 upstream, 0 downstream and 1 adjacent networks observed; most-used upstreams first.
| AS | Network | Paths seen |
|---|---|---|
| AS7004 | TELEFONICA CHILE S.A. | 3,185 |
Exchange presence is recorded rather than inferred: the directory collected by Packet Clearing House (https://www.pch.net/ixp/data) on 2026-10-11, licensed CC BY-NC-SA 3.0. Transit is inferred from observed BGP paths, never declared by either party.
Address space
Summary
IPv4 86 prefixes · 123K addresses IPv6 0 prefixes
| Country | Name | Prefixes |
|---|---|---|
| CL | Chile | 86 |
Registry
Allocation record
- Registry
- APNIC
- Handle
AS15311- Registry name
- 15311
- Registrant
- TELEFONICA EMPRESAS CHILE SA
- Abuse contact
- tecnical.isp.movistar@gmail.com
- Registered
- 2000-04-14
- Last changed
- 2024-01-25
- Allocation
- allocated
Declared
PeeringDB profile
- Name
- Telefonica Empresas Network
- Also known as
- Movistar Empresas
- Scope
- Regional
- Traffic ratio
- Mostly Inbound
- Peering policy
- Open
- Website
- https://ww2.movistar.cl/empresas/
PeeringDB records are maintained by the network operator and are not independently verified. Treat them as a statement of intent rather than of fact. For the observed and recorded view, see peering, which lists the exchanges Packet Clearing House has a port on file for.
Routing security
RPKI and IRR
- RPKI
- 74% valid · 40 valid, 14 with no ROA
- ROAs
- 32 authorising AS15311
- ASPA
- no ASPA record
- IRR
- 74% registered · 40 of 54 announcements
- Route objects
- 32 naming AS15311
Reputation
Classification and threat
Unclassified Not in the curated lists. Most of the ~80,000 allocated ASNs are not.
Spamhaus DROP
Not on ASN-DROP The network as a whole is not listed.
No DROP prefixes None of its announced space is on the DROP prefix list.
Spamhaus DROP ("Don't Route Or Peer") lists space and networks run by, or hijacked for, spam and cybercrime operations: 431 networks and 1,768 prefixes, as published 2026-10-12. A short, high-confidence list, so a match is worth taking seriously, and absence from it says little on its own.
FBI IC3
No IC3 indicators Nothing from the FBI IC3 feed.
IC3 threat data is alpha. Absence of an indicator is not evidence of good behaviour, only of absence from this one feed.
Elsewhere