Autonomous system
AS152179 GCNL-AS-AP GLOBAL COMMUNICATION NETWORK LIMITED
Residential DROP-listed space APNIC
Interconnection
Peering at a glance
Internet exchanges
No exchange port on file. Many exchanges publish no participant list, so this is not proof of absence.
Transit providers
20 upstream, 3 downstream and 24 adjacent networks observed; most-used upstreams first.
Exchange presence is recorded rather than inferred: the directory collected by Packet Clearing House (https://www.pch.net/ixp/data) on 2026-10-13, licensed CC BY-NC-SA 3.0. Transit is inferred from observed BGP paths, never declared by either party.
Address space
Summary
IPv4 281 prefixes · 128K addresses IPv6 1 prefixes
| Country | Name | Prefixes |
|---|---|---|
| HK | Hong Kong | 282 |
Registry
Allocation record
- Registry
- APNIC
- Handle
AS152179- Registry name
- GCNL-AS-AP
- Registrant
- GLOBAL COMMUNICATION NETWORK LIMITED
- Abuse contact
- abuse@hkglobalnetwork.com
- Registered
- 2023-12-15
- Last changed
- 2023-12-15
- Allocation
- allocated
Routing security
RPKI and IRR
- RPKI
- 92% valid · 385 valid, 30 with no ROA 5 RPKI-invalid
- ROAs
- 369 authorising AS152179
- ASPA
- no ASPA record
- IRR
- 82% registered · 343 of 420 announcements 5 other origin
- Route objects
- 612 naming AS152179
Reputation
Classification and threat
Residential Fixed-line consumer ISP. Addresses here are homes.
Spamhaus DROP
Not on ASN-DROP The network as a whole is not listed.
2 DROP matches Announced space overlapping the DROP prefix list.
| Announced | DROP entry | Record |
|---|---|---|
| 45.56.201.0/24 | 45.56.200.0/22 | SBL700021 |
| 198.46.8.0/23 | 198.46.8.0/23 | SBL693935 |
Spamhaus DROP ("Don't Route Or Peer") lists space and networks run by, or hijacked for, spam and cybercrime operations: 436 networks and 1,771 prefixes, as published 2026-10-13. A short, high-confidence list, so a match is worth taking seriously, and absence from it says little on its own.
FBI IC3
No IC3 indicators Nothing from the FBI IC3 feed.
IC3 threat data is alpha. Absence of an indicator is not evidence of good behaviour, only of absence from this one feed.
Elsewhere