Autonomous system
AS15054 OMEGA-TX
Residential ARIN NSP
Summary
Northeast Texas Broadband
isp telecom hosting
Four registrants, two reverse-name domains, and one that keeps the address dots intact.
What it's used for
- A regional broadband provider's network. Six IPv4 blocks and one IPv6
/32announced from the United States, with fourteen observed BGP neighbours.
Notable
- The six IPv4 blocks split across four registrants: two to the holder as
OMEGA-TX1andOMEGA-TX2, two to a municipal utility, one to360 Broadband, LLCand one to a fibre holding company. - The utility's two blocks carry a registrant field holding three entries joined by semicolons, the organisation plus an abuse contact and an operations centre.
- Reverse names answer under two domains. One uses conventional labels such as
dhcp10-254andcpeb7-255; the other writes the address with its dots left in, as66.209.36.0.903bb.com. - Four of eighteen sampled addresses answered.
Interesting
- That dotted form is the unusual one. Keeping the periods turns the address into four separate DNS labels rather than one, so the name is five levels deep instead of two, and anything splitting the name on dots to find the domain gets the wrong answer.
- The other domain's labels name the assignment mechanism and the customer equipment, which is a real disclosure about how each address is handed out.
- Four registrants under one AS is an acquisition trail. Each block kept the name of whoever held it when it arrived, and the routing is the only thing that unifies them.
- Fourteen upstreams is a genuinely well connected regional carrier.
This description is AI-generated, best-effort context — not authoritative, and provided without any guarantee of accuracy. Source, and how to suggest an edit.
Interconnection
Peering at a glance
Internet exchanges
Recorded at 1 exchange in 1 country, largest first.
| Exchange | Location | Their address |
|---|---|---|
| Equinix Internet Exchange Dallas | Dallas, United States | 206.223.118.91 |
Exchange presence is recorded rather than inferred: the directory collected by Packet Clearing House (https://www.pch.net/ixp/data) on 2026-10-14, licensed CC BY-NC-SA 3.0. Transit is inferred from observed BGP paths, never declared by either party.
Address space
Summary
IPv4 4 prefixes · 13.82K addresses IPv6 1 prefixes
| Country | Name | Prefixes |
|---|---|---|
| US | United States of America | 5 |
Registry
Allocation record
- Registry
- ARIN
- Handle
AS15054- Registry name
- OMEGA-TX
- Registrant
- Northeast Texas Broadband, LLC
- Abuse contact
- kris@360boradband.net
- Registered
- 2007-07-05
- Last changed
- 2022-08-26
- Allocation
- assigned
Declared
PeeringDB profile
- Name
- NorthEast Texas Broadband, LLC
- Also known as
- Omega Networks
- Network type
- NSP
- Scope
- North America
- Traffic ratio
- Mostly Inbound
- Peering policy
- Open
- IRR as-set
AS-OMEGA-PEERS- Present at
- 1 exchanges
- Facilities
- 1 facilities
- Website
- http://www.omeganetworks.com
PeeringDB records are maintained by the network operator and are not independently verified. Treat them as a statement of intent rather than of fact. For the observed and recorded view, see peering, which lists the exchanges Packet Clearing House has a port on file for.
Routing security
RPKI and IRR
- RPKI
- 0% valid · 0 valid, 5 with no ROA
- ROAs
- 1 authorising AS15054
- ASPA
- no ASPA record
- IRR
- 80% registered · 4 of 5 announcements 1 other origin
- Route objects
- 7 naming AS15054
Reputation
Classification and threat
Residential Fixed-line consumer ISP. Addresses here are homes.
Spamhaus DROP
Not on ASN-DROP The network as a whole is not listed.
No DROP prefixes None of its announced space is on the DROP prefix list.
Spamhaus DROP ("Don't Route Or Peer") lists space and networks run by, or hijacked for, spam and cybercrime operations: 442 networks and 1,773 prefixes, as published 2026-10-13. A short, high-confidence list, so a match is worth taking seriously, and absence from it says little on its own.
FBI IC3
No IC3 indicators Nothing from the FBI IC3 feed.
IC3 threat data is alpha. Absence of an indicator is not evidence of good behaviour, only of absence from this one feed.
Elsewhere