Autonomous system
AS13895 FIBERCONX
Unclassified APNIC Cable/DSL/ISP
Summary
FiberConX
isp telecom
The two blocks are numbered from zero, which is how programmers count and not how paperwork usually does.
What it's used for
- A Canadian network operator. 512 addresses across two IPv4 prefixes, two IPv6 prefixes, and one observed BGP neighbour.
Notable
- The IPv4 blocks are
199.212.36.0/24and199.246.76.0/24, netnamesFIBERCONX-BLK1andFIBERCONX-BLK0. - Both are registered to
Kendall Systems, a different name from the one the AS announces under. - The IPv6 prefixes are
2001:1978:802::/48and2602:fd51::/40, different sizes drawn from ranges that have nothing in common. - Six addresses were queried for reverse DNS and none returned a name.
- Routing was first seen in 2008.
Interesting
- Counting the first block zero rather than one is a habit carried in from software. It means whoever filled in the registry form thought of the blocks as an array, and it also means the numbering runs out of step with every human-facing document that starts at one.
- Two IPv6 prefixes of different sizes is the shape of a network that took a small allocation from an upstream first and a larger one under its own name later. The wider prefix leaves room the narrow one never had, and both stay announced because renumbering is expensive and leaving them costs nothing.
- One upstream for the whole network makes the AS number a portability tool rather than a redundancy one.
This description is AI-generated, best-effort context — not authoritative, and provided without any guarantee of accuracy. Source, and how to suggest an edit.
Interconnection
Peering at a glance
Internet exchanges
Recorded at 1 exchange in 1 country, largest first.
| Exchange | Location | Their address |
|---|---|---|
| Toronto Internet Exchange | Toronto, Canada | 206.108.34.206 |
Transit providers
1 upstream, 0 downstream and 2 adjacent networks observed; most-used upstreams first.
| AS | Network | Paths seen |
|---|---|---|
| AS33554 | Neutral Data Centers Corp. | 183 |
Exchange presence is recorded rather than inferred: the directory collected by Packet Clearing House (https://www.pch.net/ixp/data) on 2026-10-14, licensed CC BY-NC-SA 3.0. Transit is inferred from observed BGP paths, never declared by either party.
Address space
Summary
IPv4 2 prefixes · 512 addresses IPv6 2 prefixes
| Country | Name | Prefixes |
|---|---|---|
| CA | Canada | 4 |
Registry
Allocation record
- Registry
- APNIC
- Handle
AS13895- Registry name
- FIBERCONX
- Registrant
- FiberConX
- Abuse contact
- Jerry.Kendall@FiberConX.com
- Registered
- 2013-03-28
- Last changed
- 2013-03-28
- Allocation
- assigned
Declared
PeeringDB profile
- Name
- FiberConX Communications Ltd.
- Also known as
- FiberConX
- Network type
- Cable/DSL/ISP
- Scope
- North America
- Traffic ratio
- Balanced
- Peering policy
- Open
- IRR as-set
AS-FIBERCONX- Facilities
- 2 facilities
- Website
- https://www.FiberConX.com
PeeringDB records are maintained by the network operator and are not independently verified. Treat them as a statement of intent rather than of fact. For the observed and recorded view, see peering, which lists the exchanges Packet Clearing House has a port on file for.
Routing security
RPKI and IRR
- RPKI
- 0% valid · 0 valid, 4 with no ROA
- ROAs
- 0 authorising AS13895
- ASPA
- no ASPA record
- IRR
- 75% registered · 3 of 4 announcements
- Route objects
- 3 naming AS13895
Reputation
Classification and threat
Unclassified Not in the curated lists. Most of the ~80,000 allocated ASNs are not.
Spamhaus DROP
Not on ASN-DROP The network as a whole is not listed.
No DROP prefixes None of its announced space is on the DROP prefix list.
Spamhaus DROP ("Don't Route Or Peer") lists space and networks run by, or hijacked for, spam and cybercrime operations: 442 networks and 1,771 prefixes, as published 2026-10-15. A short, high-confidence list, so a match is worth taking seriously, and absence from it says little on its own.
FBI IC3
No IC3 indicators Nothing from the FBI IC3 feed.
IC3 threat data is alpha. Absence of an indicator is not evidence of good behaviour, only of absence from this one feed.
Elsewhere