asn.dev

Observed topology

AS137983 TIANFENG (HONG KONG) COMMUNICATIONS LIMITED

Upstreams 0 carry this network
Downstreams 12 this network carries
Adjacent (IPv4) 25
Adjacent (IPv6) 5

Transit

Upstream networks

inferred

Networks observed carrying traffic for AS137983: the AS immediately before it in a routing path. Ranked by how many paths showed the relationship, which reflects how widely it is used, not how much traffic crosses it.

No upstream observed. Typical for a tier-1 network that buys transit from nobody.

Inferred from path position, not from any declaration by either party. A network appearing here is carrying these routes; whether that is a paid transit arrangement, a backup, or something else is not something routing data can tell you.

Transit

Downstream networks

inferred

Networks for which AS137983 was observed as the last hop before the origin, meaning it appears to provide them transit.

ASNetworkTypeFamiliesPaths seen
AS54801Zillion Network Inc.UnclassifiedIPv41,696
AS152475BGPNET PTE. LTD.UnclassifiedIPv4 IPv6874
AS136798WUZHOUHULIAN INTERNATIONAL CO., LIMITEDUnclassifiedIPv4406
AS149430TIANFENG (HONG KONG) COMMUNICATIONS LIMITEDUnclassifiedIPv4295
AS149296TIANFENG (HONG KONG) COMMUNICATIONS LIMITEDUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv6243
AS131646CORE WINNER CO.,LIMITED TAIWAN BRANCHUnclassifiedIPv4126
AS136768VMTECH INCUnclassifiedIPv4114
AS151466WENWANG INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY LIMITEDUnclassifiedIPv4111
AS141167AgotoZ HK LimitedUnclassifiedIPv461
AS216224Tianjin Tianzhan Technology Co., Ltd.UnclassifiedIPv460
AS138542ZT Information Network Co., LimitedUnclassifiedIPv459
AS55888Nintatsu Global Telecommunications CorporationUnclassifiedIPv412

Adjacency

Adjacent networks

30 shown

Every AS seen directly next to AS137983 in a routing path, in either direction.

ASNetworkTypeFamiliesPaths seen
AS2914NTT America, Inc.TransitIPv4 IPv62,986
AS54801Zillion Network Inc.UnclassifiedIPv41,696
AS152475BGPNET PTE. LTD.UnclassifiedIPv4 IPv6932
AS9886CTCSCI TECH LIMITEDHostingIPv4 IPv6702
AS136798WUZHOUHULIAN INTERNATIONAL CO., LIMITEDUnclassifiedIPv4406
AS149430TIANFENG (HONG KONG) COMMUNICATIONS LIMITEDUnclassifiedIPv4295
AS149296TIANFENG (HONG KONG) COMMUNICATIONS LIMITEDUnclassifiedIPv4 IPv6243
AS6939Hurricane Electric LLCTransitIPv4212
AS64096INTERNET HARBOR INTERNATIONAL CO.,LIMITEDUnclassifiedIPv4152
AS131646CORE WINNER CO.,LIMITED TAIWAN BRANCHUnclassifiedIPv4126
AS149416TIANFENG (HONG KONG) COMMUNICATIONS LIMITEDUnclassifiedIPv4118
AS136768VMTECH INCUnclassifiedIPv4114
AS151466WENWANG INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY LIMITEDUnclassifiedIPv4111
AS18013ASLINE LIMITEDHostingIPv488
AS55888Nintatsu Global Telecommunications CorporationUnclassifiedIPv466
AS17639Converge ICT Solutions Inc.UnclassifiedIPv465
AS141167AgotoZ HK LimitedUnclassifiedIPv461
AS216224Tianjin Tianzhan Technology Co., Ltd.UnclassifiedIPv460
AS138542ZT Information Network Co., LimitedUnclassifiedIPv459
AS141174INTELLIGENT CONNECTION LIMITEDUnclassifiedIPv450
AS9002RETN LimitedUnclassifiedIPv446
AS9286KINXHostingIPv634
AS24482SG.GSHostingIPv428
AS18186Nebula Global LLCHostingIPv421
AS8966EMIRATES TELECOMMUNICATIONS GROUP COMPANY (ETISALAT GROUP) PJSCMobileIPv42
AS55720Gigabit Hosting Sdn BhdHostingIPv41

Adjacency is not the same as peering. Being next to each other in a path covers paid transit, settlement-free peering and customer connections alike, and routing data cannot distinguish them. Treat this as "these networks exchange routes", nothing more specific.

Interconnection

Exchange presence

recorded

Internet exchanges where Packet Clearing House has a port recorded for AS137983, largest fabric first. An exchange is shared switching where networks interconnect directly rather than paying a transit provider to carry traffic between them, so turning up at one is a deliberate choice about how this network wants to be reached. Each name opens that exchange's own page, with its peering LANs and every other network recorded on it.

No exchange membership on file. That is not the same as peering nowhere: the dataset records what PCH has collected, and many exchanges publish no participant list at all.

Unlike the tables above, this is recorded rather than inferred. An address on a peering LAN is at that exchange by definition. Two carve-outs all the same. Member ports counts every participant at the exchange, not this network's ports, so read it as a size proxy. And an absent exchange means PCH has no record of it, not that the network is not there.

Provenance

Where this comes from

Derived from routing tables collected at 2026-08-08 10:00 UTC by route-views2,rrc00, as seen from 75 BGP vantage points across 74.02M route entries. These are observations from those vantage points, not a complete or authoritative view of the internet.

Cross-check against RIPEstat or BGP.tools, which observe from a different and larger set of vantage points.

Exchange presence comes from a separate dataset: the directory collected 2026-08-09 by Packet Clearing House (https://www.pch.net/ixp/data), covering 1,327 exchanges and 93,164 recorded member ports, licensed CC BY-NC-SA 3.0.

PeeringDB is the better-known directory and is deliberately not the source here: its acceptable-use policy forbids the bulk storage this needs. The two answer different questions anyway. PeeringDB reports what an operator declares about itself; this reports what PCH has recorded.