Autonomous system
AS132111 BIGBANDNET-MY Bigband Sdn Bhd
Hosting APNIC
Interconnection
Peering at a glance
Internet exchanges
Recorded at 3 exchanges in 2 countries, largest first.
| Exchange | Location | Their address |
|---|---|---|
| Malaysia Internet Exchange | Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia | 218.100.44.144 |
| DE-CIX ASEAN (Singapore, Malaysia, Brunei) | Singapore, Singapore | 103.162.254.3 |
| DE-CIX Kuala Lumpur | Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia | 103.119.234.3 |
Transit providers
7 upstream, 3 downstream and 16 adjacent networks observed; most-used upstreams first.
Exchange presence is recorded rather than inferred: the directory collected by Packet Clearing House (https://www.pch.net/ixp/data) on 2026-10-10, licensed CC BY-NC-SA 3.0. Transit is inferred from observed BGP paths, never declared by either party.
Address space
Summary
IPv4 12 prefixes · 8.70K addresses IPv6 4 prefixes
| Country | Name | Prefixes |
|---|---|---|
| MY | Malaysia | 16 |
Registry
Allocation record
- Registry
- APNIC
- Handle
AS132111- Registry name
- BIGBANDNET-MY
- Registrant
- Big Band Sdn Bhd
- Abuse contact
- jason@bigband.net.my
- Registered
- 2012-01-05
- Last changed
- 2020-06-03
- Allocation
- allocated
Routing security
RPKI and IRR
- RPKI
- 35% valid · 18 valid, 33 with no ROA
- ROAs
- 7 authorising AS132111
- ASPA
- no ASPA record
- IRR
- 100% registered · 51 of 51 announcements
- Route objects
- 84 naming AS132111
Reputation
Classification and threat
Hosting Datacenter or cloud provider. Addresses are servers, not people.
Spamhaus DROP
Not on ASN-DROP The network as a whole is not listed.
No DROP prefixes None of its announced space is on the DROP prefix list.
Spamhaus DROP ("Don't Route Or Peer") lists space and networks run by, or hijacked for, spam and cybercrime operations: 431 networks and 1,775 prefixes, as published 2026-10-11. A short, high-confidence list, so a match is worth taking seriously, and absence from it says little on its own.
FBI IC3
No IC3 indicators Nothing from the FBI IC3 feed.
IC3 threat data is alpha. Absence of an indicator is not evidence of good behaviour, only of absence from this one feed.
Elsewhere