asn.dev

Autonomous system

AS12980 AT&T Global Network Services Nederland B.V.

Unclassified RIPE

IPv4 addresses 13.31K 4 prefixes
IPv6 prefixes 0 counted as prefixes, not addresses
Countries 1 mostly NL
Exchanges 0 recorded by PCH
Upstreams 4 0 downstream
Flagged prefixes 0 none

Summary

Kyndryl EMEA Hosting

Netherlands · AI-generated

hosting enterprise business

Three companies in one record: one names the AS, one names the handle, and one holds every block.

What it's used for

  • A European hosting network belonging to a corporate infrastructure services business. 13,312 addresses across four IPv4 prefixes, four observed BGP neighbours, and no IPv6 announced.

Notable

  • The AS is registered to a telecommunications company's Dutch entity.
  • The AS handle is Kyndryl EMEA Hosting Autonomous System.
  • Every block's netname is KYN-GTS- plus its address range, registered to a third company name.
  • Three of four blocks sit in 129.35, legacy class B space.
  • Twelve addresses were sampled and none returned a name.

Interesting

  • Another AS in this same range carries the identical registered company name while its blocks list a different corporation's network centre as contact. Put together, the two records trace one business changing hands twice: the addresses moved to a spun-off infrastructure company, the AS registration stayed with the telecom that acquired it earlier, and the handle was updated to the newest owner. No single field is wrong; no two of them agree.
  • KYN-GTS-129-35 builds the netname from the owner's abbreviation, a service name, and the block itself. Generating netnames mechanically from address ranges is what happens when hundreds of blocks change hands at once and nobody is going to name them individually.
  • 129.35 is old class B space from before the current registry system. Corporate hosting operations sit on address space that predates the businesses running them by decades, because the space is the durable asset and the company names are not.

This description is AI-generated, best-effort context — not authoritative, and provided without any guarantee of accuracy. Source, and how to suggest an edit.

Interconnection

Peering at a glance

Full topology · Graph

Internet exchanges

No exchange port on file. Many exchanges publish no participant list, so this is not proof of absence.

Transit providers

4 upstream, 0 downstream and 4 adjacent networks observed; most-used upstreams first.

ASNetworkPaths seen
AS209394Kyndryl, Inc.175
AS6461Zayo Bandwidth112
AS8220COLT Technology Services Group Limited59
AS3215Orange S.A.4

Exchange presence is recorded rather than inferred: the directory collected by Packet Clearing House (https://www.pch.net/ixp/data) on 2026-11-07, licensed CC BY-NC-SA 3.0. Transit is inferred from observed BGP paths, never declared by either party.

Address space

Summary

Shape and geography

IPv4 4 prefixes · 13.31K addresses IPv6 0 prefixes

CountryNamePrefixes
NLNetherlands4

Registry

Allocation record

RIPE · via Atlas (registry + RDAP)
Registry
RIPE
Handle
AS12980
Registry name
UNSPECIFIED
Registrant
AS12980-MNT
Abuse contact
peering@intl.att.com
Registered
2002-06-28
Last changed
2024-01-04
Allocation
allocated

Routing security

RPKI and IRR

Full detail
RPKI
33% valid · 2 valid, 4 with no ROA
ROAs
2 authorising AS12980
ASPA
no ASPA record
IRR
83% registered · 5 of 6 announcements
Route objects
19 naming AS12980

Reputation

Classification and threat

Unclassified Not in the curated lists. Most of the ~80,000 allocated ASNs are not.

Spamhaus DROP

Not on ASN-DROP The network as a whole is not listed.

No DROP prefixes None of its announced space is on the DROP prefix list.

Spamhaus DROP ("Don't Route Or Peer") lists space and networks run by, or hijacked for, spam and cybercrime operations: 454 networks and 1,852 prefixes, as published 2026-11-08. A short, high-confidence list, so a match is worth taking seriously, and absence from it says little on its own.

FBI IC3

No IC3 indicators Nothing from the FBI IC3 feed.

IC3 threat data is alpha. Absence of an indicator is not evidence of good behaviour, only of absence from this one feed.

Elsewhere

Cross-check