asn.dev

Autonomous system

AS12926 ARTELECOMPT Ar Telecom Autonomous System

Unclassified RIPE

IPv4 addresses 75.01K 4 prefixes
IPv6 prefixes 1 counted as prefixes, not addresses
Countries 1 mostly PT
Exchanges 1 recorded by PCH
Upstreams 3 3 downstream
Flagged prefixes 0 none

Summary

AR Telecom

Portugal · AI-generated

telecom isp business

A Portuguese operator announcing a /16, with every block still named after a company it used to be.

What it's used for

  • A Portuguese telecommunications provider. 75,008 addresses across four IPv4 prefixes, one IPv6 prefix, and ten observed BGP neighbours.

Notable

  • The inventory is 213.63.0.0/16, 213.141.0.0/19, 185.113.156.0/22 and 194.60.91.0/24.
  • Two blocks carry PT-JAZZTEL- netnames dated 20000329 and 20150817, fifteen years apart.
  • 194.60.91.0/24 is named NET-194-60-91-0-24, a label generated from the block itself.
  • The registry lookup for 213.141.0.0/19 failed, so nothing here describes that block's record.
  • Twelve addresses were sampled and none returned a name.

Interesting

  • Both dated netnames name a different company, and one of them was created in 2015, long after this operator took the space over. Whoever registered the newer block copied the naming pattern from the older ones rather than using the current name, so a defunct brand propagated forward into a record that had no reason to carry it.
  • NET-194-60-91-0-24 is what a netname looks like when nobody chose one. The registry generates a label from the address range so the field is not empty, and the result identifies the block without saying anything about it. Every such name in the data marks a block that was created administratively rather than requested by a person.
  • A /16 is 65,536 of this network's 75,008 addresses, and it dates to March 2000. Portuguese operators of that era received large blocks before allocation policy tightened, and the resulting shape is one enormous prefix with a few small modern ones attached.

This description is AI-generated, best-effort context — not authoritative, and provided without any guarantee of accuracy. Source, and how to suggest an edit.

Interconnection

Peering at a glance

Full topology · Graph

Internet exchanges

Recorded at 1 exchange in 1 country, largest first.

ExchangeLocationTheir address
Gigabit Portuguese Internet Exchange PointLisbon, Portugal193.136.250.190

Transit providers

3 upstream, 3 downstream and 10 adjacent networks observed; most-used upstreams first.

ASNetworkPaths seen
AS6939Hurricane Electric LLC333
AS29119AIRE NETWORKS DEL MEDITERRANEO SL UNIPERSONAL55
AS174Cogent Communications, LLC37

Exchange presence is recorded rather than inferred: the directory collected by Packet Clearing House (https://www.pch.net/ixp/data) on 2026-10-13, licensed CC BY-NC-SA 3.0. Transit is inferred from observed BGP paths, never declared by either party.

Address space

Summary

Shape and geography

IPv4 4 prefixes · 75.01K addresses IPv6 1 prefixes

CountryNamePrefixes
PTPortugal5

Registry

Allocation record

RIPE · via Atlas (registry + RDAP)
Registry
RIPE
Handle
AS12926
Registry name
ArTelecomPT
Registrant
AS12926-MNT
Abuse contact
abuse@artelecom.pt
Registered
1970-01-01
Last changed
2026-05-05
Allocation
allocated

Routing security

RPKI and IRR

Full detail
RPKI
100% valid · 7 valid, 0 with no ROA
ROAs
8 authorising AS12926
ASPA
no ASPA record
IRR
100% registered · 7 of 7 announcements
Route objects
9 naming AS12926

Reputation

Classification and threat

Unclassified Not in the curated lists. Most of the ~80,000 allocated ASNs are not.

Spamhaus DROP

Not on ASN-DROP The network as a whole is not listed.

No DROP prefixes None of its announced space is on the DROP prefix list.

Spamhaus DROP ("Don't Route Or Peer") lists space and networks run by, or hijacked for, spam and cybercrime operations: 442 networks and 1,773 prefixes, as published 2026-10-13. A short, high-confidence list, so a match is worth taking seriously, and absence from it says little on its own.

FBI IC3

No IC3 indicators Nothing from the FBI IC3 feed.

IC3 threat data is alpha. Absence of an indicator is not evidence of good behaviour, only of absence from this one feed.

Elsewhere

Cross-check