asn.dev

Autonomous system

AS12840 TICARETNET Istanbul, Turkey

Unclassified RIPE

IPv4 addresses 8.19K 9 prefixes
IPv6 prefixes 0 counted as prefixes, not addresses
Countries 1 mostly TR
Exchanges 0 recorded by PCH
Upstreams 2 0 downstream
Flagged prefixes 0 none

Summary

Ticaretnet (ATP Yazılım ve Teknoloji)

Turkey · AI-generated

isp hosting business

Nine prefixes carved from one range, eight of them sharing a single 1999 netname, with router loopbacks answering in DNS.

What it's used for

  • A Turkish internet and hosting provider in Istanbul. 8,192 addresses across nine IPv4 prefixes, two observed BGP neighbours, and no IPv6 announced.

Notable

  • Every block sits in 212.109: a /20, two /22s, two /23s and four /24s.
  • Eight of them carry the same netname, TR-TICARETNET-991129; 212.109.98.0/24 is the odd one out at TICARETNET.
  • Twelve of eighteen sampled addresses returned names, all of the form lo0.tho116.ticaretnet.com and lo254.tho123.ticaretnet.com.
  • First observed in the routing archive at the earliest date the archive holds.

Interesting

  • lo0 and lo254 are loopback interfaces: the addresses a router answers to regardless of which physical link is up. Naming them in public DNS is a working convention rather than an oversight, because an operator tracing a path wants to read a router's name instead of an address. It also means the reverse zone is a partial map of the network's own equipment.
  • 991129 is a two-digit year, November 1999. Two other holders in this range carry two-digit November 1999 netnames, in Poland, and one in Italy is dated that December. The registry's format change can be dated from the paperwork of networks that had nothing else in common.
  • One /20 announced alongside eight smaller blocks from inside the same range is deaggregation: the space could be advertised as a couple of routes, and instead it is advertised as nine. Usually that means different parts are handled differently, and the routing table carries the cost of the distinction.

This description is AI-generated, best-effort context — not authoritative, and provided without any guarantee of accuracy. Source, and how to suggest an edit.

Interconnection

Peering at a glance

Full topology · Graph

Internet exchanges

No exchange port on file. Many exchanges publish no participant list, so this is not proof of absence.

Transit providers

2 upstream, 0 downstream and 2 adjacent networks observed; most-used upstreams first.

ASNetworkPaths seen
AS15924Vodafone Net Iletisim Hizmetler AS953
AS34984Superonline Iletisim Hizmetleri A.S.4

Exchange presence is recorded rather than inferred: the directory collected by Packet Clearing House (https://www.pch.net/ixp/data) on 2026-10-13, licensed CC BY-NC-SA 3.0. Transit is inferred from observed BGP paths, never declared by either party.

Address space

Summary

Shape and geography

IPv4 9 prefixes · 8.19K addresses IPv6 0 prefixes

CountryNamePrefixes
TRTurkey9

Registry

Allocation record

RIPE · via Atlas (registry + RDAP)
Registry
RIPE
Handle
AS12840
Registry name
TICARETNET
Registrant
ATP YAZILIM VE TEKNOLOJI A.S.
Abuse contact
noc@tradesoft.com.tr
Registered
1970-01-01
Last changed
2021-05-07
Allocation
allocated

Routing security

RPKI and IRR

Full detail
RPKI
81% valid · 13 valid, 3 with no ROA
ROAs
14 authorising AS12840
ASPA
no ASPA record
IRR
100% registered · 16 of 16 announcements
Route objects
15 naming AS12840

Reputation

Classification and threat

Unclassified Not in the curated lists. Most of the ~80,000 allocated ASNs are not.

Spamhaus DROP

Not on ASN-DROP The network as a whole is not listed.

No DROP prefixes None of its announced space is on the DROP prefix list.

Spamhaus DROP ("Don't Route Or Peer") lists space and networks run by, or hijacked for, spam and cybercrime operations: 436 networks and 1,771 prefixes, as published 2026-10-13. A short, high-confidence list, so a match is worth taking seriously, and absence from it says little on its own.

FBI IC3

No IC3 indicators Nothing from the FBI IC3 feed.

IC3 threat data is alpha. Absence of an indicator is not evidence of good behaviour, only of absence from this one feed.

Elsewhere

Cross-check