Autonomous system
AS12555 IMAQLIQ iqdata.center
Hosting RIPE Content
Summary
IMAQLIQ
hosting datacenter colo
A Moscow datacentre with two netname conventions, three reverse-name formats and 54 neighbours.
What it's used for
- Hosting and colocation. 6,656 addresses in twelve IPv4 prefixes, two IPv6 prefixes, and 54 observed BGP neighbours.
Notable
- Eight blocks follow the dated convention —
RU-IMAQLIQ-20020502,20080502,20131009,20190730— and four instead spell the address into the name, asDC-IMAQLIQ-NET-81-29-132andDC-IMAQLIQ-NET-93-189-149-0. - Those four do not agree with each other: two end at the third octet, two carry a trailing
-0. - The AS handle is a domain name,
IMAQLIQ iqdata.center. - Reverse names appear in three shapes on the same domain:
host-29-130-254.iqdata.center,host-81-29-134-128.iqdata.center, and81-29-135-126.iqdata.centerwith no prefix at all. - Customer domains answer alongside:
mb5.valmax.ru,mail.dc1.horis.ru,bogi.stractareday.co.uk.
Interesting
- Three generated formats in one zone means three generations of the script that writes it. Each was correct when written, none was retired, and the oldest addresses keep the oldest shape because regenerating a whole reverse zone risks breaking things that already work.
- Two
20020502and20080502netnames share a day and month six years apart, which is the sort of coincidence that looks like a pattern and is not. - Customer domains in the reverse zone are how colocation shows up in DNS. The datacentre controls the addresses and delegates the names, so the tenants become visible from outside without anyone intending it.
This description is AI-generated, best-effort context — not authoritative, and provided without any guarantee of accuracy. Source, and how to suggest an edit.
Interconnection
Peering at a glance
Internet exchanges
No exchange port on file. Many exchanges publish no participant list, so this is not proof of absence.
Transit providers
14 upstream, 12 downstream and 38 adjacent networks observed; most-used upstreams first.
Exchange presence is recorded rather than inferred: the directory collected by Packet Clearing House (https://www.pch.net/ixp/data) on 2026-10-18, licensed CC BY-NC-SA 3.0. Transit is inferred from observed BGP paths, never declared by either party.
Address space
Summary
IPv4 12 prefixes · 6.66K addresses IPv6 2 prefixes
| Country | Name | Prefixes |
|---|---|---|
| RU | Russian Federation | 14 |
Registry
Allocation record
- Registry
- RIPE
- Handle
AS12555- Registry name
- IMAQLIQ
- Registrant
- mnt-ru-imaqliq-1
- Abuse contact
- abuse@iqdata.center
- Registered
- 2008-05-02
- Last changed
- 2026-02-27
- Allocation
- allocated
Declared
PeeringDB profile
- Name
- IMAQLIQ
- Also known as
- IMAQLIQ SERVICE Ltd
- Network type
- Content
- Scope
- Regional
- Traffic ratio
- Mostly Outbound
- Peering policy
- Open
- IRR as-set
AS-IMAQLIQ- Present at
- 4 exchanges
- Facilities
- 4 facilities
- Website
- http://iqdata.center
PeeringDB records are maintained by the network operator and are not independently verified. Treat them as a statement of intent rather than of fact. For the observed and recorded view, see peering, which lists the exchanges Packet Clearing House has a port on file for.
Routing security
RPKI and IRR
- RPKI
- 100% valid · 28 valid, 0 with no ROA
- ROAs
- 31 authorising AS12555
- ASPA
- 4 declared providers
- IRR
- 100% registered · 28 of 28 announcements
- Route objects
- 30 naming AS12555
Reputation
Classification and threat
Hosting Datacenter or cloud provider. Addresses are servers, not people.
Spamhaus DROP
Not on ASN-DROP The network as a whole is not listed.
No DROP prefixes None of its announced space is on the DROP prefix list.
Spamhaus DROP ("Don't Route Or Peer") lists space and networks run by, or hijacked for, spam and cybercrime operations: 442 networks and 1,784 prefixes, as published 2026-10-19. A short, high-confidence list, so a match is worth taking seriously, and absence from it says little on its own.
FBI IC3
No IC3 indicators Nothing from the FBI IC3 feed.
IC3 threat data is alpha. Absence of an indicator is not evidence of good behaviour, only of absence from this one feed.
Elsewhere