asn.dev

Autonomous system

AS11993 BANCO DO BRASIL S.A.

Unclassified RIPE

IPv4 addresses 68.35K 43 prefixes
IPv6 prefixes 15 counted as prefixes, not addresses
Countries 1 mostly BR
Exchanges 0 recorded by PCH
Upstreams 7 0 downstream
Flagged prefixes 0 none

Summary

Banco do Brasil S.A.

Brazil · AI-generated

enterprise legacy

AS11993 is held by Banco do Brasil S.A., the state-controlled Brazilian bank. This is a corporate network belonging to a single very large enterprise, not a service provider.

What it's used for

  • Bank infrastructure at national scale: RIS observes 29 IPv4 prefixes carrying about 68,000 addresses, plus four IPv6 prefixes under 2801:8e::, against only seven neighbours. The combination matters. Tens of thousands of addresses with a single-digit neighbour count is an enterprise that buys transit from a few carriers, never a carrier itself.
  • The bulk of the space is one contiguous legacy block, 170.66.0.0/16, announced as a /17 plus two /18s and then punched through with a long tail of /24s. That deaggregation pattern is what a large organisation does when it needs traffic engineering across data centres, branches and ATM estates, rather than the scattered multi-RIR inventory of a leased-address operator.

Notable

  • Sampled reverse DNS resolves to ns1.labbs.com.br. Labbs is Banco do Brasil's own developer and API platform, so the space carries first-party bank infrastructure, which corroborates the holder rather than complicating it.
  • The RDAP registrant lookups for these prefixes failed at collection time. That is a missing answer, not a clearance and not a red flag. The registrant question is simply unverified here, and the routing and rDNS carry the identification instead.

Interesting

  • The IPv6 footprint is native LACNIC space (2801:8e::/36 and friends), so the bank runs dual-stack rather than sitting on IPv4 alone.

This description is AI-generated, best-effort context — not authoritative, and provided without any guarantee of accuracy. Source, and how to suggest an edit.

Interconnection

Peering at a glance

Full topology · Graph

Internet exchanges

No exchange port on file. Many exchanges publish no participant list, so this is not proof of absence.

Transit providers

7 upstream, 0 downstream and 12 adjacent networks observed; most-used upstreams first.

ASNetworkPaths seen
AS3356Level 3 Parent, LLC738
AS4230CLARO S.A.578
AS10429TELEFONICA BRASIL S.A246
AS16735ALGAR TELECOM S/A116
AS263558RD TELECOM LTDA -ME67
AS14571Oi S.A. - Em Recuperacao Judicial45
AS28598DB3 SERVICOS DE TELECOMUNICACOES S.A23

Exchange presence is recorded rather than inferred: the directory collected by Packet Clearing House (https://www.pch.net/ixp/data) on 2026-10-22, licensed CC BY-NC-SA 3.0. Transit is inferred from observed BGP paths, never declared by either party.

Address space

Summary

Shape and geography

IPv4 43 prefixes · 68.35K addresses IPv6 15 prefixes

CountryNamePrefixes
BRBrazil58

Registry

Allocation record

RIPE · via Atlas (registry + RDAP)
Registry
RIPE
Handle
11993
Registry name
ASN11993
Registrant
BANCO DO BRASIL S.A.
Abuse contact
ditec.redes@bb.com.br
Registered
1999-02-23
Last changed
2020-05-13
Allocation
allocated

Routing security

RPKI and IRR

Full detail
RPKI
100% valid · 33 valid, 0 with no ROA
ROAs
4 authorising AS11993
ASPA
no ASPA record
IRR
100% registered · 33 of 33 announcements
Route objects
4 naming AS11993

Reputation

Classification and threat

Unclassified Not in the curated lists. Most of the ~80,000 allocated ASNs are not.

Spamhaus DROP

Not on ASN-DROP The network as a whole is not listed.

No DROP prefixes None of its announced space is on the DROP prefix list.

Spamhaus DROP ("Don't Route Or Peer") lists space and networks run by, or hijacked for, spam and cybercrime operations: 442 networks and 1,779 prefixes, as published 2026-10-23. A short, high-confidence list, so a match is worth taking seriously, and absence from it says little on its own.

FBI IC3

No IC3 indicators Nothing from the FBI IC3 feed.

IC3 threat data is alpha. Absence of an indicator is not evidence of good behaviour, only of absence from this one feed.

Elsewhere

Cross-check