asn.dev

Autonomous system

AS11840 VGRS-REGISTRY-AS

Unclassified ARIN

IPv4 addresses 5.63K 17 prefixes
IPv6 prefixes 9 counted as prefixes, not addresses
Countries 1 mostly US
Exchanges 0 recorded by PCH
Upstreams 4 1 downstream
Flagged prefixes 0 none

Summary

Verisign Infrastructure & Operations

United States · AI-generated

enterprise hosting legacy

VGRS-REGISTRY-AS is one of Verisign's operational networks. Verisign runs the .com and .net registries and the DNS infrastructure behind them, and this AS carries the company's own service estate rather than anything sold as hosting to third parties.

What it's used for

  • Verisign-operated servers and service infrastructure. RIS observes roughly 21 IPv4 prefixes carrying about 5,400 addresses, plus nine IPv6 /48s from 2620:74::/32, against six observed neighbours. Every announced IPv4 prefix is a /24, scattered across several ARIN parents (199.16.80.0-ish, 209.131.16x, 216.87.x, 72.13.x, 64.6.x), which is what an anycast and multi-site service network looks like: many small, independently placeable blocks rather than one large aggregate.
  • The sampled reverse DNS is entirely first-party verisign.com, with site-coded load balancer and router names. Those are datacenter service hosts, not user access lines.

Notable

  • All the registrant names are Verisign's own corporate entities: Verisign Inc., VeriSign Infrastructure & Operations, and VeriSign Global Registry Services. Three different org names on one company's inventory is intra-group history, not third-party space, and the rDNS confirms the operator.
  • Small address counts belie the importance of the space. Registry and DNS workloads need reach and redundancy, not address volume, so a critical piece of internet infrastructure can sit inside a few thousand addresses.

Interesting

  • The VGRS handle predates the current branding: it stands for VeriSign Global Registry Services, the arm that ran the .com/.net registry business.

This description is AI-generated, best-effort context — not authoritative, and provided without any guarantee of accuracy. Source, and how to suggest an edit.

Interconnection

Peering at a glance

Full topology · Graph

Internet exchanges

No exchange port on file. Many exchanges publish no participant list, so this is not proof of absence.

Transit providers

4 upstream, 1 downstream and 9 adjacent networks observed; most-used upstreams first.

ASNetworkPaths seen
AS6461Zayo Bandwidth779
AS3356Level 3 Parent, LLC538
AS2914NTT America, Inc.328
AS32787Akamai Technologies, Inc.61

Exchange presence is recorded rather than inferred: the directory collected by Packet Clearing House (https://www.pch.net/ixp/data) on 2026-10-30, licensed CC BY-NC-SA 3.0. Transit is inferred from observed BGP paths, never declared by either party.

Address space

Summary

Shape and geography

IPv4 17 prefixes · 5.63K addresses IPv6 9 prefixes

CountryNamePrefixes
USUnited States of America26

Registry

Allocation record

ARIN · via Atlas (registry + RDAP)
Registry
ARIN
Handle
AS11840
Registry name
VGRS-REGISTRY-AS
Registrant
VeriSign Infrastructure & Operations
Abuse contact
netadmin@verisign.com
Registered
1999-01-13
Last changed
2012-03-02
Allocation
assigned

Routing security

RPKI and IRR

Full detail
RPKI
88% valid · 29 valid, 4 with no ROA
ROAs
31 authorising AS11840
ASPA
no ASPA record
IRR
100% registered · 33 of 33 announcements
Route objects
93 naming AS11840

Reputation

Classification and threat

Unclassified Not in the curated lists. Most of the ~80,000 allocated ASNs are not.

Spamhaus DROP

Not on ASN-DROP The network as a whole is not listed.

No DROP prefixes None of its announced space is on the DROP prefix list.

Spamhaus DROP ("Don't Route Or Peer") lists space and networks run by, or hijacked for, spam and cybercrime operations: 447 networks and 1,848 prefixes, as published 2026-10-31. A short, high-confidence list, so a match is worth taking seriously, and absence from it says little on its own.

FBI IC3

No IC3 indicators Nothing from the FBI IC3 feed.

IC3 threat data is alpha. Absence of an indicator is not evidence of good behaviour, only of absence from this one feed.

Elsewhere

Cross-check