asn.dev

Autonomous system

AS11609 ELAVON

Unclassified ARIN

IPv4 addresses 3.33K 4 prefixes
IPv6 prefixes 0 counted as prefixes, not addresses
Countries 1 mostly US
Exchanges 0 recorded by PCH
Upstreams 5 0 downstream
Flagged prefixes 0 none

Summary

Elavon

United States · AI-generated

enterprise legacy

ELAVON is Elavon, the merchant payment-processing business of U.S. Bancorp. This is a corporate payments network, not a service provider — the AS exists to route the company's own transaction infrastructure.

What it's used for

Card acquiring and merchant processing: the endpoints that merchants, gateways and partner banks connect to in order to authorise and settle payments. The address footprint is small and dense, and that fits — payments infrastructure is a modest number of hardened, highly available endpoints, not a large population of hosts. RIS sees 16 announced v4 prefixes carrying just 3,328 addresses, no IPv6, and 5 observed BGP neighbours. Multiple upstreams over a tiny address count is the classic multi-homed enterprise posture: redundancy is bought for availability, not for capacity.

Notable

The prefix registrants section is the thing to read here, and it exonerates rather than convicts. Most of the announced space (204.194.192.0/22, 204.194.196.0/22 and the /24s carved from them) is registered to U.S. BANCORP under US-BANCORP-EXTERNAL-4, not to Elavon; only 216.235.188.0/23 and 198.203.191.0/24 register to ELAVON directly. A different registrant from the announcing holder is only a warning sign when the registrants are unrelated. Elavon is a U.S. Bancorp subsidiary, so this is intra-group corporate history — the parent holds the address space, the subsidiary announces it.

Interesting

Nearly every prefix appears both as an aggregate and as its component /24s. Deliberate de-aggregation like that is a common anti-hijack and traffic-steering measure on networks where a routing outage means declined transactions.

This description is AI-generated, best-effort context — not authoritative, and provided without any guarantee of accuracy. Source, and how to suggest an edit.

Interconnection

Peering at a glance

Full topology · Graph

Internet exchanges

No exchange port on file. Many exchanges publish no participant list, so this is not proof of absence.

Transit providers

5 upstream, 0 downstream and 5 adjacent networks observed; most-used upstreams first.

ASNetworkPaths seen
AS32787Akamai Technologies, Inc.780
AS701Verizon Business137
AS7018AT&T Enterprises, LLC30
AS33655Comcast Cable Communications, LLC6
AS13367Comcast Cable Communications, LLC3

Exchange presence is recorded rather than inferred: the directory collected by Packet Clearing House (https://www.pch.net/ixp/data) on 2026-10-20, licensed CC BY-NC-SA 3.0. Transit is inferred from observed BGP paths, never declared by either party.

Address space

Summary

Shape and geography

IPv4 4 prefixes · 3.33K addresses IPv6 0 prefixes

CountryNamePrefixes
USUnited States of America4

Registry

Allocation record

ARIN · via Atlas (registry + RDAP)
Registry
ARIN
Handle
AS11609
Registry name
ELAVON
Registrant
ELAVON
Abuse contact
Terry.Powell@elavon.com
Registered
1998-10-20
Last changed
2021-06-09
Allocation
assigned

Routing security

RPKI and IRR

Full detail
RPKI
0% valid · 0 valid, 16 with no ROA
ROAs
0 authorising AS11609
ASPA
no ASPA record
IRR
94% registered · 15 of 16 announcements
Route objects
14 naming AS11609

Reputation

Classification and threat

Unclassified Not in the curated lists. Most of the ~80,000 allocated ASNs are not.

Spamhaus DROP

Not on ASN-DROP The network as a whole is not listed.

No DROP prefixes None of its announced space is on the DROP prefix list.

Spamhaus DROP ("Don't Route Or Peer") lists space and networks run by, or hijacked for, spam and cybercrime operations: 442 networks and 1,779 prefixes, as published 2026-10-21. A short, high-confidence list, so a match is worth taking seriously, and absence from it says little on its own.

FBI IC3

No IC3 indicators Nothing from the FBI IC3 feed.

IC3 threat data is alpha. Absence of an indicator is not evidence of good behaviour, only of absence from this one feed.

Elsewhere

Cross-check