asn.dev

Autonomous system

AS11350 NORTHWESTERN-MEDICAL-CENTER - NorthWestern Medical Center

Unclassified ARIN

IPv4 addresses 256 1 prefixes
IPv6 prefixes 0 counted as prefixes, not addresses
Countries 1 mostly US
Exchanges 0 recorded by PCH
Upstreams 2 0 downstream
Flagged prefixes 0 none

Summary

NorthWestern Medical Center

United States · AI-generated

enterprise legacy

NORTHWESTERN-MEDICAL-CENTER is NorthWestern Medical Center, a community hospital in St. Albans, Vermont. Despite the low AS number this is a recycled ASN — ARIN registered it to the hospital in September 2017 — so it carries no early-internet history.

What it's used for

A single-site healthcare enterprise network. RIS sees one v4 prefix, 256 addresses, no IPv6, and 2 observed neighbours. That is about as small as a routed AS gets: the hospital holds one /24 and multi-homes it across two upstreams. The reason a 256-address organisation bothers with BGP at all is provider independence — clinical systems, electronic health records, imaging exchanges and payer connections cannot tolerate renumbering, and dual upstreams on portable space let the hospital survive one carrier failing without changing an address. Two neighbours confirms it is a leaf network: nothing transits through it.

Notable

The prefix 216.57.112.0/24 is registered to NorthWestern Medical Center itself under the handle NMC-113 — first-party registration with no third-party registrants in the inventory, which rules out any leased-space reading. The addresses sampled returned no reverse DNS, but that is a two-address sample and supports no inference either way.

Interesting

The name invites the obvious confusion with Northwestern Medicine, the large Chicago academic health system. They are unrelated: ARIN puts this holder at 133 Fairfield Street in St. Albans, a Vermont hospital serving Franklin and Grand Isle counties. It is a good example of why a familiar-looking name has to be cleared against the registered address before it is believed.

This description is AI-generated, best-effort context — not authoritative, and provided without any guarantee of accuracy. Source, and how to suggest an edit.

Interconnection

Peering at a glance

Full topology · Graph

Internet exchanges

No exchange port on file. Many exchanges publish no participant list, so this is not proof of absence.

Transit providers

2 upstream, 0 downstream and 2 adjacent networks observed; most-used upstreams first.

ASNetworkPaths seen
AS33422New England Telehealth Consortium38
AS7015Comcast Cable Communications, LLC25

Exchange presence is recorded rather than inferred: the directory collected by Packet Clearing House (https://www.pch.net/ixp/data) on 2026-11-05, licensed CC BY-NC-SA 3.0. Transit is inferred from observed BGP paths, never declared by either party.

Address space

Summary

Shape and geography

IPv4 1 prefixes · 256 addresses IPv6 0 prefixes

CountryNamePrefixes
USUnited States of America1

Registry

Allocation record

ARIN · via Atlas (registry + RDAP)
Registry
ARIN
Handle
AS11350
Registry name
NORTHWESTERN-MEDICAL-CENTER
Registrant
NorthWestern Medical Center
Abuse contact
awebster@nmcinc.org
Registered
2017-09-07
Last changed
2017-09-07
Allocation
assigned

Routing security

RPKI and IRR

Full detail
RPKI
100% valid · 1 valid, 0 with no ROA
ROAs
1 authorising AS11350
ASPA
no ASPA record
IRR
100% registered · 1 of 1 announcements
Route objects
2 naming AS11350

Reputation

Classification and threat

Unclassified Not in the curated lists. Most of the ~80,000 allocated ASNs are not.

Spamhaus DROP

Not on ASN-DROP The network as a whole is not listed.

No DROP prefixes None of its announced space is on the DROP prefix list.

Spamhaus DROP ("Don't Route Or Peer") lists space and networks run by, or hijacked for, spam and cybercrime operations: 454 networks and 1,854 prefixes, as published 2026-11-06. A short, high-confidence list, so a match is worth taking seriously, and absence from it says little on its own.

FBI IC3

No IC3 indicators Nothing from the FBI IC3 feed.

IC3 threat data is alpha. Absence of an indicator is not evidence of good behaviour, only of absence from this one feed.

Elsewhere

Cross-check