asn.dev

Autonomous system

AS11333 CYBERTRAILS

Unclassified ARIN

IPv4 addresses 5.12K 9 prefixes
IPv6 prefixes 0 counted as prefixes, not addresses
Countries 1 mostly US
Exchanges 0 recorded by PCH
Upstreams 3 0 downstream
Flagged prefixes 0 none

Summary

CyberTrails

United States · AI-generated

hosting enterprise legacy

CYBERTRAILS is held by CyberTrails, a Phoenix, Arizona managed-IT and data-centre operator founded in the mid-1990s and running a colocation facility on West Lone Cactus Drive in north Phoenix. It was acquired by the national MSP NexusTek in 2017 and now operates inside that group. RIS sees 16 IPv4 prefixes, 66,048 addresses, no IPv6, and 4 observed neighbours.

What it's used for

Managed hosting, colocation and business connectivity for Arizona-area organisations. The great majority of the routed space is the legacy 162.42.0.0/16 — registered in ARIN directly to CyberTrails — announced both as the covering /16 and as a scatter of more-specific /21s and /24s out of 162.42.24.0–162.42.75.0. That deaggregation pattern is normal for a provider carving a large block into per-customer and per-facility assignments and steering them individually. A router PTR on 162.42.0.5, fe-0-0-2.cr1.sno.cybertrails.com, confirms first-party infrastructure inside the block: a named core-router interface on the company's own domain.

Notable

One prefix, 104.245.80.0/24, is registered not to CyberTrails but to Breakthrough Technology Group (BTG-NJ), a New Jersey managed private-cloud provider. That is not a third-party or leasing tell. Abry Partners merged BTG into NexusTek in 2018, so BTG and CyberTrails are sister companies under the same parent — exactly the intra-group registrant pattern that a post-acquisition network leaves behind, and the reason to read the registrant field against corporate history rather than firing on any name mismatch.

Interesting

Four observed neighbours against sixty-odd thousand addresses is the signature of a regional provider, not a carrier: it buys transit from a handful of upstreams and sells capacity, colo and managed services downstream rather than peering broadly. Addresses in 162.42.0.0/16 should be read as business-hosted infrastructure, not consumer eyeballs.

This description is AI-generated, best-effort context — not authoritative, and provided without any guarantee of accuracy. Source, and how to suggest an edit.

Interconnection

Peering at a glance

Full topology · Graph

Internet exchanges

No exchange port on file. Many exchanges publish no participant list, so this is not proof of absence.

Transit providers

3 upstream, 0 downstream and 3 adjacent networks observed; most-used upstreams first.

ASNetworkPaths seen
AS2734CoreSite497
AS6461Zayo Bandwidth283
AS13649Flexential Colorado Corp.180

Exchange presence is recorded rather than inferred: the directory collected by Packet Clearing House (https://www.pch.net/ixp/data) on 2026-10-15, licensed CC BY-NC-SA 3.0. Transit is inferred from observed BGP paths, never declared by either party.

Address space

Summary

Shape and geography

IPv4 9 prefixes · 5.12K addresses IPv6 0 prefixes

CountryNamePrefixes
USUnited States of America9

Registry

Allocation record

ARIN · via Atlas (registry + RDAP)
Registry
ARIN
Handle
AS11333
Registry name
CYBERTRAILS
Registrant
CyberTrails
Abuse contact
noc@cybertrails.net
Registered
1998-07-06
Last changed
2017-05-17
Allocation
assigned

Routing security

RPKI and IRR

Full detail
RPKI
0% valid · 0 valid, 15 with no ROA
ROAs
0 authorising AS11333
ASPA
no ASPA record
IRR
100% registered · 15 of 15 announcements
Route objects
34 naming AS11333

Reputation

Classification and threat

Unclassified Not in the curated lists. Most of the ~80,000 allocated ASNs are not.

Spamhaus DROP

Not on ASN-DROP The network as a whole is not listed.

No DROP prefixes None of its announced space is on the DROP prefix list.

Spamhaus DROP ("Don't Route Or Peer") lists space and networks run by, or hijacked for, spam and cybercrime operations: 442 networks and 1,782 prefixes, as published 2026-10-16. A short, high-confidence list, so a match is worth taking seriously, and absence from it says little on its own.

FBI IC3

No IC3 indicators Nothing from the FBI IC3 feed.

IC3 threat data is alpha. Absence of an indicator is not evidence of good behaviour, only of absence from this one feed.

Elsewhere

Cross-check