asn.dev

Autonomous system

AS11313 FANNIEMAE - Fannie Mae

Unclassified ARIN

IPv4 addresses 6.14K 18 prefixes
IPv6 prefixes 0 counted as prefixes, not addresses
Countries 1 mostly US
Exchanges 0 recorded by PCH
Upstreams 1 0 downstream
Flagged prefixes 0 none

Summary

Fannie Mae

United States · AI-generated

enterprise legacy

FANNIEMAE is the Federal National Mortgage Association — Fannie Mae, the US government-sponsored enterprise that buys mortgages from lenders and packages them into securities. It is a shareholder-owned corporation under federal conservatorship, not a government agency, and its network reads as pure enterprise.

What it's used for

RIS sees 41 IPv4 prefixes, 10,496 addresses, no IPv6 and only 2 observed neighbours. The prefix count is high relative to the address count because the inventory is almost entirely /24s, drawn from two blocks: 167.133.0.0 and 198.204.128.0 upward. Every prefix in the pack is registered to Fannie Mae, under two netnames — MORNET and FNMA-CNETS. Registrant and origin agree throughout, so there is no third-party space and nothing broker-shaped in the inventory, however long the prefix list looks.

Notable

Forty-one prefixes announced to two neighbours is the shape that matters. A network that peers with two ASes is buying transit, not selling it, no matter how many routes it originates. What produces the long /24 list is not connectivity ambition but segmentation: a financial institution that keeps distinct, separately-routable public blocks for its data centres, its DMZs, and its lender-facing interfaces, because counterparties, regulators and firewall policies allowlist by source address and a stable per-function /24 is what makes that possible.

Interesting

The MORNET netname is corporate archaeology in the registry. Fannie Mae's lender-facing electronic delivery network carried that name for years, and the address blocks that served it still wear it — an internal system name outliving the system, which is a common fate for netnames and a reminder to read the org field rather than the label.

This description is AI-generated, best-effort context — not authoritative, and provided without any guarantee of accuracy. Source, and how to suggest an edit.

Interconnection

Peering at a glance

Full topology · Graph

Internet exchanges

No exchange port on file. Many exchanges publish no participant list, so this is not proof of absence.

Transit providers

1 upstream, 0 downstream and 1 adjacent networks observed; most-used upstreams first.

ASNetworkPaths seen
AS19905Vercara, LLC1,421

Exchange presence is recorded rather than inferred: the directory collected by Packet Clearing House (https://www.pch.net/ixp/data) on 2026-11-10, licensed CC BY-NC-SA 3.0. Transit is inferred from observed BGP paths, never declared by either party.

Address space

Summary

Shape and geography

IPv4 18 prefixes · 6.14K addresses IPv6 0 prefixes

CountryNamePrefixes
USUnited States of America18

Registry

Allocation record

ARIN · via Atlas (registry + RDAP)
Registry
ARIN
Handle
AS11313
Registry name
FANNIEMAE
Registrant
Fannie Mae
Abuse contact
edge_networking@fanniemae.com
Registered
1998-06-24
Last changed
2021-05-20
Allocation
assigned

Routing security

RPKI and IRR

Full detail
RPKI
0% valid · 0 valid, 25 with no ROA
ROAs
0 authorising AS11313
ASPA
no ASPA record
IRR
92% registered · 23 of 25 announcements 1 other origin
Route objects
30 naming AS11313

Reputation

Classification and threat

Unclassified Not in the curated lists. Most of the ~80,000 allocated ASNs are not.

Spamhaus DROP

Not on ASN-DROP The network as a whole is not listed.

No DROP prefixes None of its announced space is on the DROP prefix list.

Spamhaus DROP ("Don't Route Or Peer") lists space and networks run by, or hijacked for, spam and cybercrime operations: 454 networks and 1,847 prefixes, as published 2026-11-11. A short, high-confidence list, so a match is worth taking seriously, and absence from it says little on its own.

FBI IC3

No IC3 indicators Nothing from the FBI IC3 feed.

IC3 threat data is alpha. Absence of an indicator is not evidence of good behaviour, only of absence from this one feed.

Elsewhere

Cross-check