asn.dev

Autonomous system

AS11297 LIPSCOMB

Education ARIN

IPv4 addresses 1.02K 1 prefixes
IPv6 prefixes 1 counted as prefixes, not addresses
Countries 1 mostly US
Exchanges 0 recorded by PCH
Upstreams 2 0 downstream
Flagged prefixes 0 none

Summary

Lipscomb University

United States · AI-generated

education university legacy

LIPSCOMB is the campus network of Lipscomb University, a private university in Nashville, Tennessee. RIS sees a single-block campus: 1 IPv4 prefix (74.119.168.0/22, 1,024 addresses), 1 IPv6 prefix (2620:112:d000::/44), and 2 observed neighbours.

What it's used for

Ordinary campus internet: staff and faculty systems, student and classroom networks, and the university's outward-facing services. The reverse DNS makes the shape explicit. Sampled addresses return nat-74-119-168-5.lipscomb.edu and nat-74-119-170-5.lipscomb.edu — first-party names in the university's own .edu zone, and the nat- prefix says these public addresses are NAT egress for a much larger private campus network behind them. That is why a whole university fits behind 1,024 routable addresses: the visible IPv4 space is a translation pool, not a per-host inventory.

Notable

The prefix is registered to LU-MAIN-CAMPUS (org: Lipscomb University) — the netname literally names the campus, and the registrant is the holder. One prefix, one RIR, one org, wearing its own rDNS. There is nothing here to disentangle and no third-party registrant to explain.

Interesting

The IPv6 allocation is the standout: a /44 from 2620::/23, ARIN's direct-assignment range, is vastly more address space than the IPv4 /22 and is announced as a single route. That combination — a NATted IPv4 pool alongside a generous native IPv6 block — is characteristic of US higher-education networks, which got IPv6 early through their regional research-and-education providers. Two observed neighbours fits the same picture: the university reaches the internet through a small number of upstreams rather than peering widely, which is what an institutional edge network looks like.

This description is AI-generated, best-effort context — not authoritative, and provided without any guarantee of accuracy. Source, and how to suggest an edit.

Interconnection

Peering at a glance

Full topology · Graph

Internet exchanges

No exchange port on file. Many exchanges publish no participant list, so this is not proof of absence.

Transit providers

2 upstream, 0 downstream and 3 adjacent networks observed; most-used upstreams first.

ASNetworkPaths seen
AS22909Comcast Cable Communications, LLC80
AS25645Momentum Telecom, Inc.11

Exchange presence is recorded rather than inferred: the directory collected by Packet Clearing House (https://www.pch.net/ixp/data) on 2026-10-19, licensed CC BY-NC-SA 3.0. Transit is inferred from observed BGP paths, never declared by either party.

Address space

Summary

Shape and geography

IPv4 1 prefixes · 1.02K addresses IPv6 1 prefixes

CountryNamePrefixes
USUnited States of America2

Registry

Allocation record

ARIN · via Atlas (registry + RDAP)
Registry
ARIN
Handle
AS11297
Registry name
LIPSCOMB
Registrant
Lipscomb University
Abuse contact
NetworkAbuse@lipscomb.edu
Registered
2008-12-04
Last changed
2012-02-24
Allocation
assigned

Routing security

RPKI and IRR

Full detail
RPKI
0% valid · 0 valid, 2 with no ROA
ROAs
0 authorising AS11297
ASPA
no ASPA record
IRR
100% registered · 2 of 2 announcements
Route objects
4 naming AS11297

Reputation

Classification and threat

Education University, school or national research and education network.

Spamhaus DROP

Not on ASN-DROP The network as a whole is not listed.

No DROP prefixes None of its announced space is on the DROP prefix list.

Spamhaus DROP ("Don't Route Or Peer") lists space and networks run by, or hijacked for, spam and cybercrime operations: 442 networks and 1,783 prefixes, as published 2026-10-20. A short, high-confidence list, so a match is worth taking seriously, and absence from it says little on its own.

FBI IC3

No IC3 indicators Nothing from the FBI IC3 feed.

IC3 threat data is alpha. Absence of an indicator is not evidence of good behaviour, only of absence from this one feed.

Elsewhere

Cross-check