asn.dev

Autonomous system

AS11045 STERLING

Hosting ARIN

IPv4 addresses 9.98K 7 prefixes
IPv6 prefixes 1 counted as prefixes, not addresses
Countries 1 mostly US
Exchanges 1 recorded by PCH
Upstreams 3 0 downstream
Flagged prefixes 0 none

Summary

Sterling Communications, Inc.

United States · AI-generated

isp enterprise hosting legacy

STERLING is Sterling Communications, Inc., a business-focused telecom and IT provider based on SW Sequoia Parkway in Portland, Oregon. It announces 38 IPv4 prefixes totalling roughly 10,000 addresses plus one IPv6 /32, and is seen with only three BGP neighbours.

What it's used for

Sterling sells connectivity, VoIP telephony, hosted desktops, cloud services and colocation to businesses in the Pacific Northwest, and the AS is the transport layer under all of it. The reverse DNS reflects that mix directly: some addresses carry Sterling's own infrastructure names under sterling.net, while others carry customer organisations' own domains — a non-profit's gateway and a transport company's hostname among the sampled addresses. Space that wears the customer's name rather than the provider's is the fingerprint of assigned business blocks and colocated equipment, not of a consumer access pool.

Notable

The prefix registrants are all Sterling's own handles — STERLING-INTERNET, STERLING-A, NETBLK-STERLING-BLK — so despite the untidy shape (a /20, a /21 and a long tail of /24s carved out of it), this is self-registered space, not leased or brokered address inventory. Three observed neighbours confirms the role: a small number of upstreams, no peering fabric, nothing wholesale.

Interesting

The prefix list is dominated by /24s that sit inside the announced 206.72.96.0/20 and 199.34.232.0/21. Deaggregating a covering block into its component /24s like this is usually done to steer inbound traffic per-customer across different upstreams, which is a common pattern for a provider whose customers each want their own multi-homed behaviour.

This description is AI-generated, best-effort context — not authoritative, and provided without any guarantee of accuracy. Source, and how to suggest an edit.

Interconnection

Peering at a glance

Full topology · Graph

Internet exchanges

Recorded at 1 exchange in 1 country, largest first.

ExchangeLocationTheir address
Northwest Access ExchangePortland, United States198.32.195.64

Transit providers

3 upstream, 0 downstream and 4 adjacent networks observed; most-used upstreams first.

ASNetworkPaths seen
AS6939Hurricane Electric LLC1,360
AS6461Zayo Bandwidth1,128
AS13335Cloudflare, Inc.65

Exchange presence is recorded rather than inferred: the directory collected by Packet Clearing House (https://www.pch.net/ixp/data) on 2026-10-11, licensed CC BY-NC-SA 3.0. Transit is inferred from observed BGP paths, never declared by either party.

Address space

Summary

Shape and geography

IPv4 7 prefixes · 9.98K addresses IPv6 1 prefixes

CountryNamePrefixes
USUnited States of America8

Registry

Allocation record

ARIN · via Atlas (registry + RDAP)
Registry
ARIN
Handle
AS11045
Registry name
STERLING
Registrant
Sterling Communications, Inc.
Abuse contact
abuse@sterling.net
Registered
1998-03-19
Last changed
2012-03-02
Allocation
assigned

Routing security

RPKI and IRR

Full detail
RPKI
0% valid · 0 valid, 40 with no ROA
ROAs
0 authorising AS11045
ASPA
no ASPA record
IRR
78% registered · 31 of 40 announcements
Route objects
6 naming AS11045

Reputation

Classification and threat

Hosting Datacenter or cloud provider. Addresses are servers, not people.

Spamhaus DROP

Not on ASN-DROP The network as a whole is not listed.

No DROP prefixes None of its announced space is on the DROP prefix list.

Spamhaus DROP ("Don't Route Or Peer") lists space and networks run by, or hijacked for, spam and cybercrime operations: 432 networks and 1,768 prefixes, as published 2026-10-12. A short, high-confidence list, so a match is worth taking seriously, and absence from it says little on its own.

FBI IC3

No IC3 indicators Nothing from the FBI IC3 feed.

IC3 threat data is alpha. Absence of an indicator is not evidence of good behaviour, only of absence from this one feed.

Elsewhere

Cross-check